in the actual trial to explain, defend, or perhaps confess to why they aired live in many ways that led to or softened the ground for an insurrection. that is why this is a media story, but far more than a media story. the evidence has shown many knew trump was lying tatting election, but they, quote, endorsed it any way, and that word comes from murdoch himself. the reason this is in court is not because of the january 6th committee or congress or media matters, which is a fox kind of critic group. the reason is that somebody says they were legally hurt and defamed by fox, specifically one of the voting machine companies you may have heard of, dominion. today, damning new evidence as the case heats up. more emails show the internal fox news fact checking department they have one of those that is supposed to provide guardrails it fact-checked in advance and alerted some of the claims about that plaintiff, the voting machine company dominion, were just false. and then th
about fox. it s the media. it involves the immediate yam ya. but it is about how people, in this case powerful people who lost an election staged a coup to steal your vote, how he used fox to advance that. fox, whether they were a knowing malicious intermediary is what will be resolved this particular trial. looking at this as a media story is no different than those who plan to trespass or storm the capital and used reddit to promote themselves or used an app to communicate to each other and said, that s a text story. no, it s an insurrection story. it s a do you li in a democracy story. they used media to intermediate. we ve covered this a lot. without fox, sidney powell is just kind of talking.