eric: thank you for joining us, i am eric shawn. elon musk, man zero man. right now is the speaker at the annual gathering of those billionaires in idaho for they have a big one on the every year. the private conference for 24 hours after the bombshell report that he s walking away from that multibillion-dollar twitter deal. musk avoided talking about why the deal fell through during the meeting today but is now facing a huge legal battle with social media giant could enforce a $1 million payment if he is out of the deal. live in los angeles with the latest. he may not have twitter, hey, christina. that s right, we learned as you mentioned the day of the conference he didn t comment on his attempt to back out of the $44 billion deal illegal challenges he could face so he mentioned accounts on twitter. yesterday musk announced he wants to walk away from the deal with twitter claiming the social media giant has not provided accurate data on how much of its user base is made u
upset office. close, but will there be the cigar? that is how you think about that. we will see. thanks, bye. so tomorrow. the january six committee may be on hey it is but not the revelations, not at all. the latest is the former secretary of state mike pompeo, who i alluded to laura about, could sit through a closed door deposition with the committee as soon as this week. there is another one in the inner circle, mike pompeo. that according to multiple sources. why do they want to talk to him of all people? it might have something to do the 25th amendment. mr. pompeo reached out to have the conversation. in case you have not heard the discussion amongst cabinet secretaries, from what i understand, it was more of a, this is what i am hearing, how much are you aware of it, but i don t think it is worth putting on your radar because you are the chief of staff. if conversations progress, you should be ready to take action on this. that is the star witness at the hearing
in a 2011 email, giuffre claims clinton threatened van ity fair not to write articles about instep. their editor said that did not happen. and a clinton spokesman said they had no comment about the alleged incident. on wednesday in response to clinton appearing in the unsealed documents, a spokesman said it has been nearly 20 years since president clinton last had contact with epstein. with more than 150 names expected to be made public by court order, there are still several names that are under sell. in a different email the same journalist references someone being trafficked to, quote, two of the world s most respected politicians. both of their names are blacked another accuser who said that she was paid to give epstein massages that turned sexual. at least 30 girls told authorities that they were recruited to massage epstein.
will just naturally push the case count. plus i always believe, you don t want to ask for such a long adjournment at first. you want to get the discovery, go through, start to litigate the case. that white when you go back to the judge and say we need more time, you can show the judge this is how much discovery we have. this is how far we ve gotten into it. these are the problems we ve had. the government is not just going to give you all the discovery, there is going to be discovery issues where he wants him to get over the instep withheld. and then you can go to the judge with something solid and say we need more time because of all these things. so it s very difficult for a judge to say go anyway, because it s something that gets reversed. obviously it s a work in progress, the defense is a work in progress. one of the main lines of counter argument that we ve heard floated in recent days by john lauro, the president s defense attorney, one of two, is this notion that he was