report. mary, what do you think is missing from this report? well, for the family s sake i would have liked to have seen more of the detail of how they used this data to come up with their conclusions, and as david said, he s absolutely right, it s not just inmarsat. many other participants, inlewdiinlewd i including boeing and inmarsat. much better for families to proip the data and full analysis and earlier this morning on cnn, ceo of inmarsat, rupert pearce said he provided all of that to malaysia and they are perfectly happy if malaysia releases it. why they did not, i m not sure, but the data certainly does support, you know, that inmarsat had, you know, certainly a lot to analyze, and it s not just, you know, seven random points. there s something there and it s very important for the families to have it. so this report, david, was able to kind of pinpoint, maybe, where the plane went down, but does it lead to any other clues?
hmm. but i m tell you right now, family members are not exactly rejoicing over this report. it s difficult to understand. and it s the process version, not the raw data experts have been demanding. let s bring in our cnn aviation analyst and former inspector general of the department of transportation mary skeechiavo author of why planes crash david soucie. thank you to you both. does this new data show the plane indeed ran out of fuel and crashed into the southern indian ocean? you know, this isn t itself does not, carol, in my opinion. however, i m still convinced that they re correct that they did do the information correctly, but remember, there s a lot of other people involved in um canning up with these answers. there s this is a complex system, and co-dependent things going on with honeywell, with boeing, with the antenna manufacturer. there s a lot more to this than you can get from this singular