and that is only going to expand. it is the choice we have to make. how we will develop these technologies? and how we will use them? that is the critical one, especially when we are at the cusp of more and more investment in this generative ai. but as an economist you know that these technologies, including ai, are already being employed across the industrialised world. and if you also know that if you look at united kingdom or the united states, we have, almost, structurally full employment. yes, we have people out of work but not very many, and job markets are very tight. and if you look at, for example, consultancy groups like pwc, they ve analysed what they think will happen as a result of ai, they wrote a report not long ago called, will robots really steal ourjobs ? they said some jobs will go as a result of automation by ai but they will be outweighed by the creation of newjobs that
extraordinarily useful for them. now, you appear to be saying, you know what, be very careful because this is actually doing structural damage, notjust to your life but to the society and economy in which you live ? i think the answer to your question comes back to the point i made earlier. ai has great promise and potential for great damage. the generative al, or the large language models, could be a new tool for augmenting what we do in knowledge work, in white collar work, injournalism, academia. it s not currently going in that direction because actually, gpt i or chatgpt have very impressive looking results, but, deep down, they are not super useful for knowledge workers at the moment. but at the same time, many of these things are already being used for centralising information further and replacing workers that used to do simple analytical tasks such as writing tasks or summarising news and so on,
public deserve to know the depths of what was happening then and indeed now. that is what he says. and to some extent, that tells us his motivation was to appease able to get his point across, perhaps he feels some satisfaction from being able to publish that in privileges surroundings, which means that we are safe to report it, but whether that achieves what he really wants to do, which is to prove that this newspaper was responsible for illegal activity, unlawful activity which led to this hacking, as helena was telling you, that is a very different matter. it is very difficult tojudge which different matter. it is very difficult to judge which way the judge is seeing it because the judge has a perspective, judges seal the written evidence, thejudge has seen the documents and so on, and the judge will be sleeker more evidence tomorrow, but this underlying feeling that he feels he is on a crusade, if you like, a mission to try to put right what has gone wrong in journalism, try to put
sank to an all time low against the dollar. the british tv presenter phillip schofield resigns from itv after acknowledging he had an affair with a younger male colleague. now on bbc news, it s time for amol rajan interviews. in every trade, there are certain names that are held up as the gold standard. when i started out in newspapers in fact, for most of the past 50 years there have been two names that stood apart and stood above any others injournalism. bob woodward and carl bernstein were the reporters at the heart of the watergate scandal and the subsequent fall of president nixon. therefore. ..i shall resign the presidency effective at noon tomorrow. their investigation into the break in at democratic offices has become the stuff of legend.
describes the planned assault as an historic opportunity . now on bbc news: amol rajan interviews: watergate to trump. in every trade, there are certain names that are held up as the gold standard. when i started out in newspapers in fact, for most of the past 50 years there have been two names that stood apart and stood above any others injournalism. bob woodward and carl bernstein were the reporters at the heart of the watergate scandal, and the subsequent fall of president nixon. therefore, i shall- resign the presidency, effective at noon tomorrow. their investigation into the break in at democratic offices has become the stuff of legend. it saw them immortalised by hollywood and set the standard forjournalism for decades to come. at one point, i suddenly wondered how high up this thing goes,