because otherwise the problems continue. let me read a little bit more and we ll get some specifics as to how you can get that information out there. sure. arthel: a little bit from this report. this is from the secret service. attackers did not fit a rigid profile, with the exception of gender. 83% were male. their ages range from 12 to 18. whites accounted for 63% of suspects, while 37% were of other or mixed races. what does this data tell you? so it s really important to know that we can t profile a specific school shooter. so since we can t, we have to start looking at behaviors. and we do know that the pathway these people don t snap generally. there s a pathway towards violence. along the pathway we all have to understand what exhibits or behaviors they have that we may be able to pull from to start getting them resources and start looking a little deeper into the individual to see whether or not
frankly. i think he d do great. i like to have people go up, except one thing, it validates a corrupt investigation. adam schiff, he s a corrupt politician. he s as corrupt as you will ever see. when he makes up my words and reads fake words to congress. former national security advisor bolton did not show up for his interview on thursday. bolton and his former deputy cooperman have asked the courts the weigh in on whether or not they should defy wlous orders and testify white house orders and testify as the legislative branch wants bolton s attorney says he is willing to talk but only if the courts approve. house democrats withdrew their subpoenas accusing the administration, these officials of trying to delay or obstruct their investigation. in a letter to the house, general counsel, bolton s attorney said he is dismayed by the house s decision and suggested that they are leaving behind valuable information. bolton the letter says was
democratic house to impeach the president. but their goal is to make sure zero republicans vote for impeachment. arthel: what would be more beneficial for the president for gop lawmakers to ask questions that will convince the american people with a defined defense for the president s actions? i believe the republicans put out a list of witnesses they would like to see at the hearings. arthel: not just the wish list of witnesses. i mean the folks who are already scheduled to appear. would it make more sense for the republican lawmakers to actually ask questions that will bring out information that will back upw what the president is saying. it will be a tough rode to who because the actual
teacher didn t feel like sharing the information, that s a piece of the puzzle we don t have. i m not saying threat assessment teams are the only answer. it takes it to the local level. parents should collectively meet with school boards and their school principals and say this is a path we should pursue. let s form one. let s get proper policies in place. let s evaluate how they have worked elsewhere, and let s kind of see how we can prevent this. arthel: mostly law enforcement do a great job on scene there, but i understand that the secret service is also trying to work with them as well because we know that there were some direct calls that were made in some of the cases where that information wasn t taken all the way to the top. sure, we feed to be critical of ourselves we need to be critical of ourselves as well. if law enforcement makes a mistake or doesn t do what they should be doing, we should be holding ourselves accountable as well. we will do that, prepared to do that.
involved. was there a conspiracy? and then we re going to take that information and pass it on to the judiciary committee. we also need to understand was there a coverup in not getting that whistleblower complaint to congress and our committee is looking into why that information wasn t transferred. congressman, thank you very much for being on the show this morning. let me turn now to congresswoman maxine waters. thank you for getting up early to be with us. i m delighted to be with you. i need to get your reaction to several things we ve been talking act this morning. first, your reaction to the revelation that the second whistleblower has come forward? well, you know, i fully expect that there s going to be more, and i believe that as time goes on in these investigations, more members of the state