presenting evidence to grand juries in washington, d.c. and also in miami. how much longer is this going to go before there is a decision for charges based on a, the meeting of the trump team with justice department officials. you heard i m not sure if you heard it, but chris christie, former new jersey governor, current presidential candidate, he said he guesses that that is because the justice department sends a target for indictment letter to him, based on everything you re hearing, what do you think in terms of timeline? you know, when i heard about the meeting at doj, my first thought is it s imminent. chris christie is right, a m meeting at doj is one of the last steps before an indictment drops. but the news today that the special counsel is still il illiciting witnesses is in intr intriguing. this investigation may not be as close to finished as we thought it was. it also appears now somewhat
when this was sent around, the first thing i thought was having flashbacks to all the times he would tweet things when we were on capitol hill together that he must know something secret here. then realizing he doesn t know anything at all. he s just trying to front run something or message something in advance that he knows is coming and try to create the environment in a beneficial manner for him. that s clearly what he was doing. ask keeping his lawyers he didn t have any intel into what was happening. this is not an unimportant element of what s about to happen should this actually come to pass. you have seen it from republicans at the retreat in florida, you have seen it from the former president s lawyers in trying to create conditions at a moment they know the da s office is not able to come out and try to counter. but try to counter the messaging they don t have it until an indictment drops. they are trying to use this moment to their advantage. and in every way, both the cou
different state charges, that means trump s pardon for stone would actually not let him off the hook. you might still have state charges. this is part of the communication from the indictment. it s about two months before the indictment drops. it says person 1 stated in part word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps. drops. one shortly after i m back. second in october. impact planned to be very damaging. corsi confirmed to cnn the information in the indictment is accurate. how much of a problem is that for stone? well, i think it s a big problem for him as far as this indictment goes. i mean, this indictment is a very strong indictment. the evidence seems to be solid. you know, they have lots of texts, lots of written materials backing this up. they may end up with the written testimony of jerome corsi. kind of within the four corners of this indictment and these charges it s really important. i don t think, again, it s going
goods or aid and abet computer hacking, even if trump pardons stone, you could still have a new york state prosecution for stone, which means he needs to cooperate. as this was all happening, just for the last couple of days of you just answered the question i had. thank you. i appreciate it. because if it does go to you said state charges or if it goes to the southern district of new york, is that what you re saying? no, i m talking this is federal and state. so mueller and fdny are federal, and then the question are different state charges, that means trump s pardon for stone would actually not let him off the hook. you might still have state charges. it s about two months before the indictment drops. it says person 1 stated in part word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps. impact planned to be very