we ll get the two pages so they can cough them up now or tell get complicated starting tomorrow night. what are the chance you will hold them in conat the present time of congress. we are not just hold in ton tempt we will also impreach. impreach christopher ray. we are not messing around. late this afternoon the fbi and d. o. j. caved a government source that nunez and committee stars were shown a largely unredacted version of memo that triggered the fbi s russia probe. source tell fox news there are still series questions about the underlying intel and the credibility of the sources used to initiate that russia probe. here to react to the development. jim jordan of ohio a member of the house oversight commit each
congress has the power to impreach. there s no desfinition what a high crime actually is? we re talking two different things, though. it is clearly a political question whether the president can be impeached and that is up to congress to define what a high crime in this demeanor is. it is not the same when you re looking at a criminal case. under the obstruction of justice laws of the united states, i don t believe any man or woman is above the law, and that includes the president. so if the president as nixon did, for example, says to the cia, stop the fbi from going ahead. tell them there s national security involved, and that s a lie, that s obstructing the fbi s investigation. if he tells witnesses, you can say i don t remember, i don t recall, even when you do, that s not true. that s asking someone to commit perjury, and that s obstruction of justice and a crime. so there are many ways that you
condition, congress should begin impreach meant proceedings. presidents do not get to pick and choose which americans to help at times of disaster. and last night on this broadcast nicole wallace was openly questioning whether or not the president knew before this storm that puerto ricans were tax-paying american citizens. he has since said that, you know, they can t have fema or the military forever. what do you make of where he is on this issue and these folks? well, where to begin? i mean, first of all, nicole wallace, as we all know, worked for president george w. bush as a senior adviser and communications and she knows very twhwell that for george bu his response to katrina was a real low point for his administration. and it was very difficult because his ratings went down so much as he was seen as not properly responding to that crisis. in fact, we see that now the
republicans introduced a way to impreach the commissioner. it was lois lerner s that slowed the applications for tax exemptions. and congress willal committees investigated learner. republicans said they stone walled inquiries. we are really left with no alternative. the inspector general did an exhaustive search and looked at this. we have dually issued subpeonas and despite that the irs commissioner came before congress and the information he provided to congress and the testimony he gave is false. there are consequences. testifying before the senate finance committee, he acknowledged that the irs made
i think that is the element that s particularly dishonest here. it s perfectly legitimate for john mccain. even though he softened his earlier position. he s evolved. let s not come back and say this is a scandal and this administration is in violation of the constitution. they can complain that this administration didn t alert congress as it was supposed to. that s another legitimate thing to say. but that doesn t mean it s a scandal. lind day graham is talking about impreach. he actually brought the word up. listen. it s going impossible for them without just a huge backlash. people on our side are calling for his imimpeachment if he did that. you know, it s only a matter of time, they are the party is that calls for impeachment. and just two weeks ago, senator