immigrants already here living in the u.s. in his own words, they have to go. trump is positioning himself the head of what we ll call the round-them-up caucus, the part of the party that s perfectly comfortable telling millions of americans we re coming for your friends and loved ones and colleagues and coworkers. we re going to lock them up and throw them out of the country. then there s the nominally more moderate ring of the party which is arguing not that trump s approach is wrong, but that it s just impracticable. unrealistic. or as jeb bush told the washington post, quote, a plan needs to be grounded in reality. obviously, there s some ideas that have merit, but the majority of it is really not a workable plan that could ever pass congress. donald trump s eight-page plan is gibberish and unworkable. what he s not doing is embracing a workable system. while that may be correct on the merits, it might not be as extreme as trump s rhetoric as they pointed out on this show l
what the state is hoping to compensate for. you re playing god over a whole group of people s lives and i don t think we re supposed to play god like that. how does a state begin to make amends for the wrongs it committed against its own people? the money is fine. the money fine. we still ain t going to pay anything back. this is a story about a government paying the people it s harmed. in the united states, in the south, in a state controlled by republicans. i thought it was a simple matter of justice. they had been physically harmed, emotionally harmed and never been comp saided. in the context of america s torturous racial history, it s a third rail, one of the most polarizing concepts in all of american politics. they ve been dismissed over time as impracticable, impossible. the excuses for the not giving reparations today are the
you have heard many time, is it s impracticable in this 24/7 environment. you say what to that? my experience is that isn t true. the number of emergencies that have come up during the night have been very few and we all have each other s phone numbers. so the idea you have to be checking your smartphone all night to be a good employee is not true. and i realized that it was a horrible addiction. everytime the thing would vibrate i d get a shot of adrenaline, and if i looked at it in the middle of the night i wouldn t be able to go back to sleep as well, and i realized if this is sort of an addiction for me, i have to watch out with all the people who work for me, not to deliver this into their lives, and it s not what i want from them for productivity reasons and also for humanity reasons. i think as people s boss, we have a responsibility to make good life, and i think that impacts turnover and monetary things as welch as well.
should be turned over to the state. mitt romney made the case that mr. perry is wrong in thinks view and his idea is impracticable. here is a sampling of mitt romney s questions about how perry might do that. what would happen to the social security trust fund if you sent social security back to the states? how would they dived it? what happens by the way if people move from state to state to state? you consider all the people who have retired in florida, would it be florida s responsibility to meet the social security needs of everyone who comes to florida? reporter: mr. romney rattled off a whole rhetorical list of such questions trying to make the arguments that perry s proposal in miss book fed up that social security should be handled by the states is not doable. mr. romney argues with a few minor adjustments over time social security can be saved.