documents. but again, we can t have a knee jerk reaction overreact because we still have to run military and government organizations so that we can protect the national security and general hertling. you raised the prospect that this individual could have had a security clearance. we re also learning that this group they shared, you know, racist memes and things like that. that he there s a video allegedly of him making racist and anti semitic comments. i wonder does and does all of this put together point to potential problems if he did have a security clearance with that clearance process that would allow someone like that to have access to this kind of sensitive information. yeah it certainly does, abby. but truthfully, we ve talked about this many times in the past where you can t be 100% 0 defects. you know this is an individual, sean just said i think this implicates truthfully part of our culture to the desire to be famous. the desire to be bigger than everybody else. this was
barbara for a final word. if people are tuning around now. explain to them what they ll be watching and them what they ll be watching and the significance of these moments. we are watching the former president donald trump are about to take off from parma beach airport in florida to go to new york where he used to live to face legal action. he s going to be entering the courtroom there and handing themselves over after being indicted on criminal charges and will be facing the judge to hear what the are and we are told he would plead not guilty. the significance is that he is the first former us president ever to face criminal charges which is a big step, historically speaking in the us. it does cross a certain boundary line because, although it is been legally possible to implicates or
environment. this has the feeling of a are thrill kill of a thrill kill for many on the left, and they need to think seriously about how this, what this implicates for the legal system. you know, this is a claim that a not only the justice department didn t pursue, but bragg s predecessor in his office can t pursue it to court. but also bragg himself threw a flag on the play. the only reason i think we re seeing this case is that two of his prosecutors resigned. in my view, they acted really inappropriately in the case of one of them who wrote a book about someone who wasn t even charged, let alone convicted. and that pressure, i think, finally found its mark with bragg. and they bring this rather curious charge based on the falsification of state records and connecting it to an uncharged federal crime. joey: well, come tuesday we ll see where this goes and what the fall ifout immediately is. fallout immediately is. jonathan turley, thank you so
firm speaking of stock, ken, you re reporting part of the investigation into the silicon valley bank is going to be about stock. and stock that was sold in particular by executives ahead of the closing of that bank. our friends at cnbc point out that executives have old $84 million. ceo greg becker cashed in $3 million a week before the failure. almost $30 million in the past two years. so, what are your sources telling you about the overall investigation? they re saying that the fbi and s.e.c. has to take a look at any illegal information would be moved to in stock sales. and a plan that was executed in january, nonetheless, that stock is worthless at this point at one point it was worth $300 a share. the government has to look and make sure nobody traded on improper, inside information and if they did that, they broke the law and that would be a problem. how implicates are those types of cases?
the same time shutting down their investigation and sealing it in a file so only top officials could gain access to it. so i do hope that representative comer of thpresentative comer of only looks into the fraud, the bribery, the corruption, the influence peddling of hunter biden, it directlys an implicates his father as an expected beneficiary, but also into government action, which is prohibited in another first amendment censorship, either overtly or covertly. so, congressman, back you and i served on the house judiciary committee together as an honor to de ittee o so. of in honor to de ittee o so. issues facing the houseyou re judiciary committee, you re a former prosecutor. a whatosecutor, what and how do yf will play out in the house o f representatives on the judiciary committee? well, jason , good to be with you. i think there s two criticalues issues here.