afternoon. right before i let you go, mayorkas is doing what president biden wants him to do. if they are talking about impeaching mayorkas, why stop there? if he is doing what his boss wants? trey, impeachment argument that is political rhetoric, we know that secretary mayorkas is time for a change. this week s hearing i highlighted that to him, you know we don t need impeachment or resign it s time for a change. i would say took border security is part of it but immigration pieces is equally important. i think it is important if house republicans would focus on work visa that make sense and help america move the ball forward, i was on border on christmas day, i saw a border patrol agent, it of that looked exhausted his shift started, that same
Joe-biden
Doing
Impeaching-mayorkas
Boss
Trey-gowdy
Hearing
Secretary-mayorkas
Rhetoric
Impeachment-argument
Change
It-s-time-for-a-change
Impeachment
it is a matter of fact that the president is an ongoing threat to our national security and the integrity of our elections, the basis of our democracy. we cannot rely on the next election as a remedy for presidential misconduct when the president threatens the very integrity of that election. president trump s wrongdoing and the urgent threat that his actions present to our next election and our democracy leaves us no principled alternative but to support these articles of impeachment. we are on the precipice of the 2020 election and congress has ultimate responsibility to protect the sacred equalizer, our right to vote. the foundation of the democrats impeachment argument is that the president s use of a
President
Fact
Matter
Election
Elections
Democracy
Integrity
Threat
Security
Basis
Misconduct
Remedy
word on this. the republicans and defenders of the president are arguing right now that courts shouldn t make a decision about mcgahn and by extension other cases because they would be in fact weighing in on an impeachment argument. they re having it both ways. it not fair. but you are fair to be on the show and make your case, i love you for it. thank you, jennifer rodgers, always a pleasure to have you here. the best to your families for the holidays. tricky jimmy. you, too, chris. could impeachment help the president politically? we re seeing the suggestion of that in numbers. it worth looking at. what are the risks, what is the exposure? how do these three fine mind see it? we ll get the breakdown next. s. now with 25% more concentrated power. nothing works faster for powerful cold relief. oh, what a relief it is! so fast!
President
Fact
Courts-shouldn-t
Defenders
Word
Decision
Cases
Ways
Republicans
Impeachment-argument
Extension
Show
it was big, hurry up, this is urgent. there s also a concept in the law called frivolous lawsuits, frivolous lawsuits. this is not a frivolous lawsuit. has a colorful claim and an argument to be made before the courts. he has no claim. the judge laughed at it. with mcgahn they re saying don t go through the courts. now it s impeachment they want to pull mcgahn into it now? no, no, no, no hold on. now they want mcgahn. this is a contrived political show. this is the last word on this. the republicans and defenders of the president are arguing right now that courts shouldn t make a decision about mcgahn and by extension other cases because they would be in fact weighing in on an impeachment argument.
Freedom-of-information-act
Argument
Hurry-up
Claim
Lawsuit
Concept
Frivolous-lawsuits
Impeachment
Courts-shouldn-t
Mcgahn
Judge
Dont-go
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.