Latest Breaking News On - Immigration naturalization act - Page 6 : comparemela.com

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20170208:01:19:00

Concern. the first question out of the gate, one, was do you have any evidence for why these countries were chosen and why this ban was in place? that was telling to show them that, listen, it must be more than hypothetical to trample on separation of powers or constitutional rights. don t courts give wit latitude to the president on issues of national security? mass ive latitude. i got it upside the head how much latitude the executive branch gets. i disagree with one panelist, there are times the court says we cannot review this, classification questions. when it comes to i disagree with the last speaker. when it comes to the decision about whether there is a threat or not under the immigration naturalization act, the courts do not have the authority, it is a c violation of the separatiof powers for the courts to second-guess the president s assessment. they do not have that authority. i want to bring in paul

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20170208:01:23:00

Can t use it if it s not the actual reason. they want to know if the emperor has no clothes. if he doesn t, you can t have the executive order stand. part of the ap2cnãi can t answer of the foundation of this order because they use president obama s classification of the countries from which danger from terrorism arises and congress . that was not trump s own discretion. it was not his own decision. he used his discretion for the immigration and naturalization act to take their judgment, president obama s judgment. anybody on this show want to say he was a bigot when he made that judgment? i don t. how about congress? were they bigots when they decided iran was dangerous? that classification is bulletproof. when this case is over, these seven countries and the blocking these countries until the time period is over will stand. the only thing that may go down is what frankly the federal government has already conceded and that is the inapplicability to lawful permanent residents.

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20170128:19:28:00

With me. what is very troubling here, casey mentioned that they re reviewing those on a case-by-case basis. that s very disturbing. because these are people s lives. on a minute-to-minute basis. let s tap into that expert. we ve heard president trump speaking to the christian broadcasting network saying he wants to prioritize christians coming into the united states. is that even possible? can you make a distinction saying christian, allowed in or not? no, first of all, his actions are illegal under current law. the 1965 immigration naturalization act specifically banned immigration on certain countries. in the past, we gauge preference to countries western europe, northern europe. that hasn t been the case in decades. trump is trying to take us back to that.

Transcripts for CNN CNN Newsroom With Carol Costello 20160614 13:53:15