How to assess the quality of the urban environment . A special index was first introduced 6 years ago; it is calculated based on 36 indicators from safety to road quality. What is important is that this rating is not a competition between cities, it shows the vector of further local development. To make decisions that will change the face of the megapo. With a favorable environment increased to 68 over 5 years. Their number reached 759. The average index value was 200 points. Compared with in the nineteenth year it grew by 18 . I would especially like to note that all three achieved indicators are above the planned values of the national project. For comparison, when the index was first calculated based on the results of 2018, the share of cities with a favorable environment was approximately three times less 23 . What is important is that the index connects national and federal projects with local programs, because the synchronized development of cities in key areas, infrastruct
Should contribute to the solution of a number of systemic tasks that were identified by the head of state, primarily the achievement of technological and financial sovereignty, as well as strengthening food security, it is necessary to further increase russias role in global trade, but first of all, to ensure domestic demand through the supply of nonresource products , achieve further improvement in the quality of life of our citizens. The measures. Taken by the government last year gave good results, they visible in the dynamics of the Gross Domestic Product and the positive changes that have occurred in many sectors, we discussed them in detail last week as part of the annual report of the government in the state duma, at the beginning of the twenty fourth year the growth trend has not changed, our economy continues to develop confidently assessment of the ministry of economic development. Years, the basis for such changes is the creation of demand for new russian goods and services,
Men. Im not sure, theres no question there has been a convergence at the end of the cold war and if you look like issues like was me or iraq itself but there were people on the left who had documentary challenges working on a regular isolationist, thats certainly true and that is what is an independent is other than perhaps someone who chooses casebycase. Guest writer somebody that recognizes that can be as simple party line on these National Security issues and somebody who doesnt want to be bound by a partyline on social and cultural issues. Interestingly i find kissinger as a young man was in rather the same position. He thought of himself as a small c. Conservative. He certainly didnt selfidentify as a liberal in the 1950s or harvard. But what being counters real american conservatism by goldwater supporters of 1964 Republican Convention he was appalled and he had an uneasy relationship with the rise of the Republican Party with the neoconservatives as well. Thats one of the intere
We have four scholars here today well placed to pick up these themes from, intriguingly, different kinds of angles and backgrounds. Let me go ahead and introduce them. To my left is henry cole, an assistant professor at yale where he holds appointments in the medical school and History Department. He is also on the faculty of cognitive science. He is working on what will be a terrific book on the history of mind and Brain Science in the late 19th century currently titled other mines other minds. David is the author of storytelling and science, rewriting oppenheimer and the nuclear age. Just out, his attitudes towards he studies attitudes towards studying science in the modern united states, he is interested in nuclear history, environmental history, and the history of energy. He is currently working on a book about the way that Rachel Carson and other in other contemporary authors have shaped views on environmentalism. Andrew is a professor at harvard. He is especially interested in en
At in the History Department vanderbilt university. We are here today to talk about a number of things. Im sure that more will come out in the discussions. The intellectual work of inence, the place of science intellectual history and the relations between science and intellectual history. Many other threads as well. We have four scholars here today well placed to pick up these themes from, intriguingly, different kinds of angles and backgrounds. Let me go ahead and introduce them. To my left is henry cole, an assistant professor at yale where he holds appointments in the medical school and History Department. He is also on the faculty of cognitive science. He is working on what will be a terrific book on the history of mind and Brain Science in the late 19th century currently titled other mines other ds. David is the author of storytelling and science, rewriting oppenheimer and the nuclear age. Just out, his attitudes towards studying science in the modern united states, he is interes