if something is true, people just won t believe it. and so someone who that image effects, may be a politician or a leader canjust say, may be a politician or a leader can just say, well, may be a politician or a leader canjust say, well, that may be a politician or a leader can just say, well, that is fake news and even though its general and, fake news and even though its generaland, because fake news and even though its general and, because there is so much the outcast throughout society. genuine. that so much the outcast throughout society. genuine. society. genuine. that is a phenomenon society. genuine. that is a phenomenon loan society. genuine. that is a phenomenon loan - society. genuine. that is a phenomenon loan known i society. genuine. that is a. phenomenon loan known as society. genuine. that is a - phenomenon loan known as the phenomenon loan known as the liar s phenomenon loan known as the liar s dividend. it is not only that liar s
as for an international body, ijust don t think that is likely. when it comes to jobs, it s obviously going to change the nature of what jobs are available. some jobs may no longer exist, other newjobs will emerge. but of course many people are trained up to do the jobs that exist in current society, so how do we deal with that? i think the impact is going to be bigger than the industrial revolution. i think the labour market will be fundamentally different. now there is this debate going on about, is this going to augment us or is it going to automate us? ultimately i think it will become a very political issue, because it will be both. and the really interesting thing is that this is true now for the first time for white collar work. do you think there actually is a worry that we are giving more control over to automated systems because they are just faster and better than us and then every so often something goes wrong, a bit like the financial crisis. sure, i think that s a legit
you tapped in four zeros or whatever it was, and you could hear people s messages. but that would be like if there was a spate of muggings out there in the king s road right now and i warn you, by the way, i ve heard there s a spate of muggings. be careful. so i was completely honest about it. i was open. it was in front of my chairman, it was in front of the bt boss, in front of all these people. and i don t like actually to be too critical of him given his condition now, and i watched the documentary, it s very moving, recently, but on that he reall let s state some facts for some people that don t know the detail and haven t been over this. there have been dozens of civil hacking cases against the mirror group and we know at least five who have been awarded damages for phone hacking by the mirror during the period when you were editor. that s gazza, sadie frost, shane richie, luke taggart and the tv producer robert ashworth. now, those are the ones we know about cos they came out
most people, piers, would find that quite concerning. i couldn t give a monkey s cuss. the idea that. you couldn t give a monkey s cuss about the fact that. ? why don t you walk around and ask 100 members of the public, do you have any sympathy for prince harry when it comes to privacy now? zero. this guy, he s got no time for his family. he comes all the way, 5,000 miles, this eco warrior, to come and lecture the media once again about invasion of privacy and intrusion. and yet he s the biggest invader of privacy in royal history. prince harry has just written a 400 odd page book. he reveals private conversations with his brother and his father at his grandfather s funeral. think about that for a moment. he reveals text messages from the princess of wales and so on and so on and so on. all the things he s railed against the media for doing over the years, he s done with bells on. so, no, i m not going to take in lectures from him, and i don t give a damn what actions he wants to tak
allowed to say the word enormous but not allowed to say the word fat . ludicrous. but the reaction to that suggested to me that a lot of people, even on the left of politics, who you might have thought of as being part of the cancel culture, thought this is not a good use of time or brain cells. it s not that. it s actually because the woke worm has turned. the war against the wokery and by wokery i don t mean what woke originally was intended to mean, which was a raised awareness of social and racial injustice. i ve studied all the history, i ve put it all in my book, and i made the point that i am woke by that distinction. but what it s become is a form of fascism. it s become a mind set of people on the hard left who just want to basically have everybody conform to their worldview. isn t fascism slightly overstating it? it s not, because it s the same ideology. look, there s fascism in theory and there s fascism in practice. and aren t you again going too far when you say that