and witnesses are not showing u up. it is compromising that basic constitutional duties of the court. the court s constitutional duties are to ensure a fair and just process for everybody. attorney general jeff sessions responded to the california chief justice on friday, slamming her for the stocking allegation, calling it irresponsible. he also said she should take her complaints to the politicians who approved sanctuary city loss because he says jails ignoring i.c.e. detainer requests is really driving the need to arrest criminal aliens at the courts. their job is to administer the law fairly and without political bias, and this is an area where they need to step back into their role as judges. i.c.e. does not track arrest locations so officials say they cannot tell us arrest at courthouses really is up or not. jon: thank you. we are back in a moment.
person behind bars while i.c.e. looks into the case. and if there s a detainer and whether or not it applies to federal law. there is federal law that could be interpreted to say that unless someone is being held for other reasons, it s against their constitutional rights to be held only on an i.c.e. detainer. we ll keep you posted on what we hear back from the attorney there. immigration reform has been a huge topic so far in the presidential debate. it was brought to the fore by donald trump s announcement speech back in june. there was a big push on immigration there. thank you for being with me. great to be with you, poppy. let s talk about what donald trump has said frankly from when he took that podium in june and made that long announcement speech that he was running and talked about illegal immigration in this country followed by a number of cases like the one that sarah just reported on. does that help?
san francisco refused to honor an i.c.e. detainer. santa barbara makes the same requirement. no hold without a federal requirement. that s something the feds new but ignored. it is, quote deprioritizing undocumented immigrants who commit no serious crimes. that s defined as a conviction for an aggravated felony, three minneapolis significant phony. what is significant? they don t sigh the assault was pled down to misdemeanor battery and didn t qualify. 25,000 criminal aliens will not be deported because of the new guidelines and given the recidivism rates marilyn phares will not likely be the last victim. thank you. all right. william, thanks for the report. at this very moment, jurors in colorado are making a life or death decision. they re weighing whether to execute the colorado movie master killer, james holme.
recent was an illegal immigrant who should have been deported a long-time ago. we don t care what the circumstances were. we ll do what we need to do to get our facts and bring this individual to justice. if there are extenuating circumstances that arise as a result of that, then we, being undocumented immigrant we ll let the proper authorities address those issues. reporter: like the steinle case who was murdered by an illegal immigrant after san francisco refused to honor an i.c.e. detainer. what make this is case worse, both sides, the county and the i.c.e., ignored what they knew to be a huge loophole because of the steinle case. both the state and the feds are trying to protect criminal aliens. the administration claims ramirez didn t meet its enforcement priorities. california prohibits cops from holding low-level offenders without a court order. the result is this disconnect allows criminals to prey on innocent americans. today, jon, police and prosecutors will hold a press
he says he found it which is pretty rare to find a gun, a loaded gun in a park bench, but that s another story. the fact is that in this country, you have a lot of people president obama has been talking about this. that have gone to jail for, you know minuscule amount of drug and they re given life sentences, and this guy, you know, was released five times. and was deported five times. just seems like it s odd that this would be a reality in this day and age. yeah there is the federal courts have found, basically, that i.c.e. holds i.c.e. detainers, are unconstitutional because they violate the fourth amendment. they re not signed by a judge, only i.c.e. agents therefore many sheriffs across the country do not respond to i.c.e. detainers. immigrations and custom enforcement is well aware of it because the federal court decisions came down last year yet they have yet to set up a system where they have judicial review of the i.c.e. detainer requests to protect all americans const