this is another gapping vulnerability that we have in our system. wasn t there a move after 9-11 you d know this better than i that because of agencies weren t sharing or relating or hanging on, you know, very selfishly to information and not comparing notes with other intelligence agencies, the fbi to the cia, what have you, that we were going to avoid that and it would lead to more such sharing that was recommended at the time. so people would all be on the same page. but it is somehow morphed into tens of thousands, maybe 200,000 individuals that have the type of security clearance, maybe not to get all of this material but a lot hoff it. yeah, i think we overcompensated for that. there was the human cry after 9-11 and justified about not sharing information. but you know, i just think in
i think frankly it s a lot of noise. you ll remember at the starts of the documents case when the fbi des desended on mar-a-largo and seized documents, you heard the same human cry. it subsided after a few weeks and the legal system. it s taking its proper course now. and i suspect that the same thing will happen here and we ll be dealing with these issues in a court of law, which is should be aired and adjudicated. neil: we should be fair and balanced here. i don t see that happening here. kevin, thank you very much, a very good read on this. you helped me through it. i want to pursue that more with darren shaw 0. our fox news decision desk. one thing that is clear looking at the political impact, the former president s popularity has soared.
industry allowed a lot of inspection by equipment, inspection by computer, you know, no humans involve in doing the inspection and the purpose of that was obviously more inspections more thorough spicks, cheaper inspections, because in years past, the federal rail administration inspectors were criticized for not doing robust inspections, for example, only looking sporadically at trains, looking at one side versus the other, so the mechanized inspection systems were thought to be better. why there s not more oversight or concern when we have you know, 1,000 derailments a years, well, some people say it s lobbying by the industry, but i also think it s just the lack of attention to rail transit in this country, human beings were on more of the trains, for example, can you imagine if airlines had that kind of a crash rate? there would be an incredible human cry, as there should be.
it is interesting how widespread his businesses are. there are 1 million ways that if someone wanted to get him cash and have it look like a business transaction but not really be one, that would be very simple. you don t need unaccounted china to do that. you could just read to thousand rooms at the old post office hotel for the weekend and not show up. and that would be a huge gift to him that would have the patina of legitimacy to it and would be not discoverable by our financial disclosure forms or even these tax returns. you know, harry, to your point before about a bigger picture, there was a sense when questions of trump s criminality dominated the conversation about his presidency. the norm busting sort of receded. but in a lot of ways the norm of releasing your taxes and your candidate for a public office, that norm falling without a human cry, lead to
school professor rebecca former manhattan assistant da thank you for being here. my pleasure. i am sorry for the theatrics, but the little suit calls for it. and it does beg the question, is that what he is trying to hide? basically his estate plans, who gets white in the trump empire? what do you think all this human cry is about? i don t think he is so concerned about what they are gonna see. i think this is, in a way, publicity. as well as an effort to, a last-ditch, effort a hail mary to stop this investigation that is increasingly closing in on him in a way that is troubling. i mean, there is a lot at stake. do you, so, his lawyers, at least a fraction of the lawyers did not want trump to file this hail mary. what are the effects it could have on the case? even if it is basically thrown out? i mean, does this further antagonize the ag s office? what about the judge that is making all of the decisions in this case? yeah, the attorney general