We have a plan up front. They look at what we can achieve and set the goal aggressively as we can reasonably achieve. We look to expand the lbes and trade packages with coordination with them to get to the 20 goal and we are pleased when we get over the goal. For example with cruise terminal inaudible . Im sorry. Let me get to the right one and a lot is the availability with the subcontracts and the hrc does and we partner with them in that work. For example if we use that as an example and see them over long period of time just not meeting the goal when they come again for bidding on something do we take into consideration they werent able to meet the goal or always below it . Its a process and as we monitor this and good to do this in open session quarterly. As we monitor this with the project manager we talk with them when its not meeting the goals and whats happened . Why arent they meeting the goal . Is it a change in scope of work . If they dont meet them and theyre fined and its
Commissioner hillis. Here. Commissioner moore. Here. And commissioner avery. Here. Commissioner sugaya. Here. First up is items for continuous and item one at harve street and proposed for continuous until december 13, 2012. Further under the consent calendar item six at 2895 san browny avenue request for conditional use authorization. This project sponsor has requested a continuous to december 6. Is there any Public Comment on these two items . Do you want to talk about item 11 . Six . 11. Yes. Under the calendar with consultation with the City Attorneys Office this item needs to be continued to november 29. Could you repeat that item, that last item please . Absolutely. Commissioners, under your regular calendar item 11 the amendments to administrative code chapter 31 to clarify certain procedures provided in that specifically ceqa is proposed for continuous after consultation with the City Attorneys Office. Is there any Public Comment on the three items that are proposed for continu
Here. Commissioner sugaya. Here. First up is items for continuous and item one at harve street and proposed for continuous until december 13, 2012. Further under the consent calendar item six at 2895 san browny avenue request for conditional use authorization. This project sponsor has requested a continuous to december 6. Is there any Public Comment on these two items . Do you want to talk about item 11 . Six . 11. Yes. Under the calendar with consultation with the City Attorneys Office this item needs to be continued to november 29. Could you repeat that item, that last item please . Absolutely. Commissioners, under your regular calendar item 11 the amendments to administrative code chapter 31 to clarify certain procedures provided in that specifically ceqa is proposed for continuous after consultation with the City Attorneys Office. Is there any Public Comment on the three items that are proposed for continuance . Regarding of course lack of public notification in a timely manner. It
A social history of New York, told entirely through its restaurants. For our 10th Yesteryear Issue, we dove into the NYC’s most legendary dining rooms. This is “Who Ate Where.”