again, i dispute your characterization of what occurred in that proceeding. in fact, the judge considered holding prosecutors in criminal contempt. she backed off only after your hastily called press conference the next day in which you retroactively made the distinction between the russian government and the russian troll farms. did your press conference of may 29th have anything to do with the threat to hold your prosecutors in contempt the previous day for publicly misrepresenting the evidence? what was the question? the question is did your may 29th press conference have anything to do with the fact that the previous day the judge threatened to hold your prosecutors in contempt for misrepresenting evidence? no. the fundamental problem is, as i said, we ve got to take your word, your team, faithfully, accurately, impartially, and completely described all of the underlying