and cell phones, and we were getting very little from the ground. and the goal we had was to do a systematic analysis and look at those airstrikes that successfully hit isis as well as those that hit civilians. we looked at areas in mosul and around it. what we found by excavating the rubble, finding any presence of isis, figuring out whether there was a legitimate target nearby, interviews hundreds of survivors, witnesses and civilians and taking these allegation to local officials is that one in five of the coalition airstrikes was resulting in civilian death. we provided it to the coalition and the air force where it conducts this air campaign from
but how did you go about figuring all this out and gathering the information? it s a great question. we knew for a long time while there were these tens of thousands of airstrikes happening there was very little information coming from the ground. part of that was from isis which had a monopoly on information and cell phones, and we were getting very little from the ground. and the goal we had was to do a systematic analysis and look at those airstrikes that successfully hit isis as well as those that hit civilians. we looked at areas in mosul and around it. what we found by excavating the rubble, finding any presence of isis, figuring out whether there was a legitimate target nearby, interviews hundreds of survivors, witnesses and civilians and taking these
so, it was the government that allow this to happen. existing gun laws would have stopped this, but they weren t enforced because the bureaucracy is incompetent. and the only person was armed with a private gun that you would like to ban. why doesn t this make you rethink your life s work? i m really glad that guy was there, everybody ought to stipulate that it was good that a good guy with a gun happen to stop this guy, but there ve been 377 mass shootings this year inn the united states. a good guy generally is not there. plus if you ask police chiefs whether it makes sense to have more guns in a shoot-out, almost inevitably, even if there is a good guy withos a gun, it civilians they end up shooting. better for everybody to get assault weapons than to rely on a good guy. tucker: to do an analysis of accidental shootings by police department. they are very, very common, very common, and people are injured by them. i ve seen the numbers.
up every basic assumption of gun control. it was the government that allow this to happen, existing gun laws would have stopped this, but they weren t enforced because the bureaucracy is incompetent, and the only person was armed with a private gun that you would like to ban. why doesn t this make you rethink your life s work? i m really glad that i was there, everybody ought to stipulate that it was good that a good guy with a gun happen to stop this guy, but there ve been 377 mass shootings this year in the united states. a good guy generally is not there, plus if you ask police chiefs whether it makes chance to have more guns in a shoot-out, almost inevitably, even if there is a good guy with a gun, it civilians they end up shooting. better for everybody to get assault weapons than to rely on a good guy. tucker: to do an analysis of accidental shootings by police department, they are very, very common, very common, and people are injured by them.
according to the ap the police force for the region says five suspects shot and killed in cambrils were carrying bomb belts, detonated by the bomb squad. reports say that the suspects had hit civilians with a carr before being shot. today s attacks a sobering reminder about the difficulty in stamping out radicalism within the islamic faith. with more on that, we are joined by the founder and president of the islamic forum for democracy zuhdi jassar. joining us from phoenix. i just want to read from your talking points.oc you say that it is not about to stamping out to violent extremism, we have to focus on violent islamic system.. what do you mean by that? right now currently up in the total last eight years, focusedl on the symptom, terrorism, trying to predict when they will be violent. and unfortunately for the agents and global homeland security, very difficult to predict when