voters support him because he s going to make the country better, he s got money, he s got lots of money and you have if you re a voter you have a purpose with your vote for ben carson all the way through. i think he blocks ted cruz. the similarity is i interviewed ben carson and he talked about the holocaust. historically inaccurate. i mean, beyond inaccurate. yet it doesn t matter what he says, it doesn t matter what donald trump says. the people in the the voters, at least, or the people coming to these rallies don t seem to mind. because a lot of his voters predate the campaign. they go back to he s a hero in the medical community. his books and they have a personal attachment. right. they have a personal attachment. who else? nobody else does. so let s say that in iowa it s either carson or trump and the republican establishment runs to new hampshire hair on fire. who do they rally around then for the other side of the equation? right now it s a tossup. who h
secretary clinton tried to hide every one of her e-mails, she destroyed 30,000 of them, and now we have an fbi investigation of those very e-mails. what s taken us so long is that the democrats on the committee and this administration have played hide the ball and have denied us records the american people deserve and that our committee needs to complete our investigation. we would have been happy to move more quickly, but we ve met with obstruction all along the way. before i get to congressman schiff, one more question for you. you talk about all the different witnesses you ve called. why haven t you called the following witnesses: general carter hamm, samantha power in the white house now and an ambassador to the u.n. you could have called her. the former cia director at the time, general petraeus, he hasn t been called. former defense secretary leon panetta wasn t called. why haven t these people been called before your committee if this is about benghazi? they were all there at
i m saying nobody in the work that s been done and take months and months and washington follows you. if you get elected president, months to create some select committee. you have to get somebody to but agreed to under duress follow your lead in washington, to pacify conservatives is itself under scrutiny. whether you like it or not. listen, at the end of the day, it s not about read i m joined now by two members of leadership. and by the way, in each of those fights, every time we ve had a battle between me and leadership with the republican caucus, about half of the caucus has been with me, about half of the caucus has been with leadership. the committee, republican mike at the end of the day, if you re pompeo of kansas, republican and democrat adam schiff. looking for someone who s congressman pompeo, this has running to be a member of the been a tough ten days for the credibility of your committee club, that s not me. thanks to the mccarthy statements and hanna statements.
but is he a true ambassador to the u.n. conservative? that s a decision for the you could have called her. the former cia director at the house republicans to make. time, general petraeus, he mark levin, who you joked and hasn t been called. former defense secretary leon said i want mark levin as a panetta wasn t called. why haven t these people been called before your committee if speaker. this is about benghazi? he s definitely a true conservative. they were all there at the time. so you ll say that but you chuck, we re not done. won t say he doesn t think you may think this investigation paul ryan is. ends on thursday, but let me he doesn t like his stance on the debt limit and tarp. assure you that it does not. we began in may and we are going i have said consistently to continue. throughout that the question of this on thursday is just one house leadership the question of more step along the way. house republican conference. i want to move to foreign we may well
republicans say they want to get to the bottom of the attacks in benghazi in 2012 on that september 11th day when four americans were killed. democrats say the committee is a partisan effort designed to discredit clinton by focusing just on her e-mails. either way, it could be a turning point in the race for 2016. i will do my best to answer their questions, but i don t really foe what their objective is right now. hillary clinton is trading one stage for another. any reaction to the benghazi ads? not since president gerald ford defended his pardon of richard nixon the purpose was to change our national focus. has an active presidential candidate had so much on the line in an appearance before congress. but clinton can now quote house republicans when she tries to argue that questions about her handling of the 2012 benghazi attack that left four americans dead are now nothing more than a political witch-hunt. this whole effort was set up for political partisan purpose