Several other policies sprinkled through the preservation element exclusively policies 1. 8 which states develop and maintain and official city register of identified Historic Resources and associated documentation which should be made readily available to Property Owners and Government Agency and policy related that we wanted to educate the public about and policy 11 which is to collect guidelines to protect artifact of the historical San Francisco understanding of the environment that we collect this information and under objective 7 we can go further and talk about how to distribute that information. There is objective six which we looked at our last hearing, the entire objective focuses on promoting Historic Preservation through incentives and guidance. Its closely related to the intent of objective 7 with a slight focus. With that im going to jump to policies and we have 7. 1, promote awareness of San Franciscos Historic Resources. Again, we have a terminology issue here. We would
September 17th meeting and talk about this again we weigh out what resources are available for a project. Is there someone involved to help this move forward. We did this before and we had commissioner alumni martinez here and did this before as we figure out how to get this off the list and which have the resources on a volunteer basis from the public. Eye i would suggest we add it to the list and not add additional staff time. Would you mind if we move to september. Fine. Thank you. With that well close for these two items and if we could then, because we have a conflict. I make a motion to recuse commissioner pearlman. Second. There is a motion and a second. Commissioner hyland, yes, commissioner johnck, yes, john, yes, commissioner matsuda, pearlman, commissioner hasz, that passes 70. We heard and did not comment on the 199 carl situation. Do we have any questions for staff at this time . Seeing none. Public comment on 199 carl . Seeing none, well close public comment. And commissi
Several other policies sprinkled through the preservation element exclusively policies 1. 8 which states develop and maintain and official city register of identified Historic Resources and associated documentation which should be made readily available to Property Owners and Government Agency and policy related that we wanted to educate the public about and policy 11 which is to collect guidelines to protect artifact of the historical San Francisco understanding of the environment that we collect this information and under objective 7 we can go further and talk about how to distribute that information. There is objective six which we looked at our last hearing, the entire objective focuses on promoting Historic Preservation through incentives and guidance. Its closely related to the intent of objective 7 with a slight focus. With that im going to jump to policies and we have 7. 1, promote awareness of San Franciscos Historic Resources. Again, we have a terminology issue here. We would
Purchase small residential buildings from proneers Property Owners for renting at a reasonable rate and some can be around the cultural preservation. Finally our recommends no. 6, the last one we wanted to highlight which is much more longterm goal but to establish a citywide Historical Preservation program with targeted benefits. We believe that a Designation Program would better enable the city to identify resources for the government sponsored Assistance Program and Financial Initiative incentives. Its also important to note that there are models of the Designation Program for intangible Group Heritage for the intangible groups of social and humanity, barcelona has a resource cat categorical heritage and japan since 1950 s and San Franciscos Designation Program would be able to fit the needs. Just to wraup up our presentation. Much can be done immediately to lay the groundwork for a comprehensive citywide program. First of course as desiree mentioned social is the preservation eleme
Fundraising if its a nonprofit or someway to help. You are talking about june 2015. Thats not a very long time between now and then to have a program like this instituted with regulations or not but however it shakes out is not a lot of time to save Something Like the roxy. The program in london had some regulatory. If the subcommittee could at least, obviously thats something to consider. If i can just respond to that briefly. In terms of the way we envision, places like the roxy already have protections. And also having a citywide designation program, if a cultural asset receives public assistance of some kind, we believe it should have some regulatory role into the city to make sure that vichlt investment to that asset is honored. Commissioners, any last comment . I like the idea about the workforce economic development. I dont know, have you gone to the Mayors Office on this already . I think that would be very important. Either we initiate Something Like that, we are all here on b