Dashcam ra dashcamera evidence. We have not. In colorado the dashcameras are used routinely by the Colorado State patrol. It is left up to the individual officers when they want to use individual cameras. From a prosecutors point of view this hasnt been a difficult tool to employ . No the with respect to dash cameras, senator. The complexity is logarithms when i understand. Mr. Henderson the only reason were probably having this hearing is because of these private videos that have shocked everybody. You agree with that . I do. In those cases, were glad we have video evidence. I mean youve got the North Charleston case thats in litigation so ill be careful of what i say. But in that case only god knows what the story would have been. Youre absolutely right. Its these private videos that have really motivated the public debate. As i said earlier you deserve great credit for convening this conversation. On balance, if you could get the right protocols to protect privacy and make sure the
Whats even more important, the people that they serve are suffering and weve got to have a big bold path forward to fix this. With that i yield back to the chair. Thank you. Mr. Kauffman, youre recognized. We get scope of practice questions here in the congress relative to the veterans administration. I think a lot of these issues have been resolved down at the state level before state legislatures and ive been on both sides of it as a state legislature where i think they are Better Qualified at the state level to make those decisions. They can have hearings and they know that the docs providers within their communities. I guess my question to you is, clearly people that well, my question to you is, what do you think about devolving the scope of practice issues down to reflect whatever the standards are within the given states that these va facilities are in . Number one and obviously want to make sure the providers are credentialed and trained to perform those duties within the scope
The form of non v. A. Care and choice care to get this right. If i can make two quick observations. Youre absolutely spot on. First of all we have to force ourselves to make certain decisions about what care can be most efficiently delivered in the community. So weve talked before my example the chairman remembers optometry. Why would we send a veteran 100 miles to get his eyes checked and get some glasses . We can do that anywhere. We wouldnt we routinely be referring that out to the community unless a veteran really wants to come to va. We are learning right now, again working to manage towards requirements rather than just a budget number, every time we improve access to care with a new facility, with additional staff, demand changes. Part of what were trying to understand are what are the dynamics. For example, you look in phoenix where we know were under penetrated in the veteran market. We improve access to care and we get a disproportionate response back. Weve got to understand
Look at the commercial espionage realm and that is the bulk of this. In that realm, what we need to think about is the governments are inherently not dynamic or decentralized and therefore, they are not the right answer. The right answer to the problem is lets get the standard items norms of behavior and empower the private sector who has decentralized the dynamics to deal with this, much like the analogy where i grew up in texas, you have a local police force and the nypd and you dont always need a Big Government solution. And frankly, in this case, going back to the bank analogy, having a private solution, responding as long as they meet the certification in the standards, government doesnt have to solve all of our problems and we can in fact solve it ourselves, that highend dedicated attack is the realm of statesponsored government and you heard general alexander say and he got in trouble for that we dont even have our act together or the cybercommand that has just now announced tha
The presiding officer the senator from new york. Mr. Schumer i ask unanimous consent the quorum be dispensed with. The presiding officer without objection. Mr. Schumer mr. President , i ask unanimous consent that as if in legislative session the senate proceed to the consideration of s. 1774, a bill it to reauthorize the undetectable firearms act of 1988 for one year introduced earlier today, that the bill be read three times and passed, and the motion to reconsider be laid upon the table with no intervening action. The presiding officer is there objection . Mr. Sessions mr. President , reserving the right to object, this is not a good day to move forward with this legislation. Wed be glad to give it serious attention. I know its the kind of thing we probably can clear at some point, but i would object. The presiding officer the objection is heard. Mr. Schumer mr. President. The presiding officer the senator from new york. Mr. Schumer i appreciate my friend from alabama, my gym mate an