Basis and no clarity and so to help us later on, i mean i personally feel that commissioner on that note we are trying to find that language moving forward and im wondering if planning can help us in the code. Maybe we should ask planning that question. So the question i have really is to have dpfks in the code of planning yards in regards to temple item 12 im sure. So the desire of the board to see the public works can provide the clarity on the item. No right now something on the bingo it defines number tentatively. Theyd our challenge and my concern as well so, i mean i dont know my how other commissioners feel. Address the question to dpw. If one of you want to im the big boss in the how house. Mr. Bryan the question is unclear thats a code requirement or something that can be negotiated because there are conditions that the appellant the permit holder can agree to the code requirement is contrary that significantly impairs the view of discern thanks thats what youre looking at but
Commissioner on that note we are trying to find that language moving forward and im wondering if planning can help us in the code. Maybe we should ask planning that question. So the question i have really is to have dpfks in the code of planning yards in regards to temple item 12 im sure. So the desire of the board to see the public works can provide the clarity on the item. No right now something on the bingo it defines number tentatively. Theyd our challenge and my concern as well so, i mean i dont know my how other commissioners feel. Address the question to dpw. If one of you want to im the big boss in the how house. Mr. Bryan the question is unclear thats a code requirement or something that can be negotiated because there are conditions that the appellant the permit holder can agree to the code requirement is contrary that significantly impairs the view of discern thanks thats what youre looking at but this is Something Different perhaps the parties negotiate after all weve with
Okay ladies and gentlemen, this meeting will come to order, the regular meeting of the land use and transportation committee. My name is supervisor malia cohen, im the chair of this committee and to my right is supervisor scott wiener, vicechair and to my left is supervisor kim, who will join us shortly. I want to welcome our colleague ms. Julie christensen who will comment on an item on the agenda today. Our clerk is ms. Andrea ausberry and i want to recognize Jennifer Lowe and leo, who will be broadcasting this meeting at sfgovtv. Thank you very much. Madame clerk, do you have any announcements excellent, thank you very much. Could you please call item no. 1. An ordinance amending ordinance no. 2815 is construction emissions minimization plan. Thank you very much. I am the maker of this ordinance and colleagues, so this ordinance includes some technical cleanup for amendments to an ordinance that the board passed earlier this year. This ordinance we passed required higher emission st
Committee. My name is supervisor malia cohen, im the chair of this committee and to my right is supervisor scott wiener, vicechair and to my left is supervisor kim, who will join us shortly. I want to welcome our colleague ms. Julie christensen who will comment on an item on the agenda today. Our clerk is ms. Andrea ausberry and i want to recognize Jennifer Lowe and leo, who will be broadcasting this meeting at sfgovtv. Thank you very much. Madame clerk, do you have any announcements excellent, thank you very much. Could you please call item no. 1. An ordinance amending ordinance no. 2815 is construction emissions minimization plan. Thank you very much. I am the maker of this ordinance and colleagues, so this ordinance includes some technical cleanup for amendments to an ordinance that the board passed earlier this year. This ordinance we passed required higher emission standardss and equipment for the city public works projects. At the time they passed this ordinance, there was confli
Mean i personally feel that commissioner on that note we are trying to find that language moving forward and im wondering if planning can help us in the code. Maybe we should ask planning that question. So the question i have really is to have dpfks in the code of planning yards in regards to temple item 12 im sure. So the desire of the board to see the public works can provide the clarity on the item. No right now something on the bingo it defines number tentatively. Theyd our challenge and my concern as well so, i mean i dont know my how other commissioners feel. Address the question to dpw. If one of you want to im the big boss in the how house. Mr. Bryan the question is unclear thats a code requirement or something that can be negotiated because there are conditions that the appellant the permit holder can agree to the code requirement is contrary that significantly impairs the view of discern thanks thats what youre looking at but this is Something Different perhaps the parties ne