dispute resolution mechanism, which would snap back sanctions, so it may be that iran is not going to find a friend in europe that it s looking for, but there are a lot of other people who are involved. the belief that has been revealed as a mistaken belief under the formation of this plan and the obama administration, was that the moderate faction in iran would be strengthened. if the for nuclear weapons decrease in ten years from now when time the past it would be all the big laugh, but in reality, that moderate faction was neither as moderate as they thought, nor as close to being able to hold onto real power into the government. instead, hardliners have advanced, and that s what we are staring down in iran now, an important hard-line group in tehran. john: the president has said he is open to talks without condition with the ayatollah. iran has said that it could see dialogue, but not the way the united states is behaving. let s listen to a spokesman for the office and
organizations it s so profoundly dangerous. what s your thought on the mgos do this incredible work? i agree, we pay a ransom or hostage exchange. the record is that riches and power terrorists group leads them tho kid more more later on. europe behaved irresponsibly i think by having governments pay ransom in ways that completely impower islamic these hostaging are held by hard line group. i don t think there s an easy way to get them safely out barring a peace process in afghanistan which is the way the
to those two cities in the same way pro-government cities laid siege to aleppo. iran insists over the past several days that two cities be evacuated simultaneously along with people from east aleppo. most rebel groups in east aleppo conceded to that demand, but one hard-line group has resisted all week until just today. the rebel group has finally agreed to allow wounded people to leave, and given the tract record. a lot of us are watching closely. thank you so much. it seems now in the wake of the election america is understanding the dangers of fake news. that s next. drastically.
caucus, this hard line conservative group. the house freedom caucus has a lot of rules such as they need 80% of their nebs members on boo issue an endorsement. they have more than 70%. that s a big hurdle. he put the ball in their court, said i ll run for speaker if you re on board. if you re not, then this one is on you. so he got that endorsement. right now it looks much, much more likely that paul ryan will be the next speaker of the house than it did last night. he has two other groups in the house republican caucus that he needs to get on board. those have always been much more likely than the house freedom caucus. there s a moderate grupp and conservative but not fight as hard line group. they ve been ideologically aligned with paul ryan. they ve always seen hill as a thought leader. so he s almost certain to get their support. it turns out the easy job will be winning the speaker seat, the hard job might be actually holing it and wielding
i think it s pretty tough for someone like chris christie to get through a republican primary at this point. but if the other sort of splits the more hard line group and it did look like they were going to end up with a moderate, i think that could be the problem. right now the tea party has such control over the republican party, they can hardly be dissatisfied enough to actually splinter off at this point, don t you think, larry? well, that assumes pure rationality. and i m not sure it s always there. but in a sense, i think they can make the argument, that is the leaders of the republican party can make the argument for one more try. you know, normally in american history, a party that has been shut out for eight years, running against the same candidate as the republicans have been against obama, they can hold together for one final try to take over.