isis headquarters. we have between 8 and 900 people in the country at any given time. the russians don t want us to be there, obviously, even though they re opposed to isis as well, but they re just trying to make life difficult for the united states and its allies, given the russian attack in ukraine. this is far from ukraine, but it still demonstrates how important the russians feel about making it difficult for the united states. these kinds of things these kinds of harassments will continue. they re liable ultimately to be some sort of catastrophe with a russian plane colliding with an american vehicle, but for the time being, these things will continue. okay, thank you so much. colonel, jack jacobs and kelly cobiella, create talking to both of you. now, the short lived but massively consequential rebellion led by yevgeny prigozhin has caused the mercenary chief s reputation to
ku klux klan. the sixth amendment grants the right to confront your witnesses in open court. in this case, the government is going to call a confidential witness against doug. that s reserved for organizations like ms-13. the court in this case granted the government s request citing concerns about online harassments. let s not miss the logic here, tucker. the logic is that anonymous twitter accounts are akin to violent criminal organizations. it just gets worse. it just gets worse. doug s defense can t cross examine this confidential witness on this individual s john going relationship with the fbi. it s deeply troubling. these are issues that tucker: these are let me ask you, it seems to be the u.s. congress should be withholding
happen again. on the question of subpoenas, there s a mostly set of facts here. scott perry got a subpoena which he denied. he is now promising subpoenas of his own. you ve been on this program before, talking about the need to increase the enforceability of congressional subpoenas. it was with the power of subpoenas playing out. it is congressional subpoenas without. there is no realize asian of the hypocrisy what to do, and that s a challenge on his face which is, we have to point out the falsehood of this equivalence. democrats conducted investigations, of things like january 6th. it justified republicans engaging in vexatious litigations, over oversights, and harassments, in the biden ministration. endless hearings about hunter biden s laptop, for no example. we were attacked on january six. there was multiple lines for the election and, it is not the same thing is what republicans are about to do. it will be
january 6th. it justified republicans engaging in vexatious litigations, over oversights, and harassments, in the biden ministration. endless hearings about hunter biden s laptop, for no example. we were attacked on january six. there was multiple lines for the election and, it is not the same thing is what republicans are about to do. it will be important for us to point out, what is legitimate, what is illegitimate, and to law let them blur the distinction, and try to do with the democrats to. in terms of tit-for-tat, one of the things with the assignments, and they have voted paul gosar and the wake of new comments they made, or revealed comments they made and saying that nancy pelosi committed treason, and it s