To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
Whether you represent FDCPA plaintiffs or defendants, recent decisions provide new insight on how standing issues may affect your case.
The doctrine of standing determining who is a proper plaintiff to bring a particular lawsuit seems straightforward. Most lawyers are familiar with the multi-pronged test flowing from the Supreme Court s 1992 decision in
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife: To have standing, a plaintiff must demonstrate an injury-in-fact, caused by the alleged wrongdoing, and capable of redress by the court.
But recent court decisions underscore the complexity of standing in the context of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Whether you represent FDCPA plaintiffs or defendants, the cases summarized below provide new insight on how standing issues may affect your case.
Supreme-court
Supreme-court-spokeo
Midland-credit-mgmt-inc
Assocs-inc
Global-trust-mgmt
Consumer-litigation-committee
Green-bay-inc
Fair-debt-collection-practices-act
Seventh-circuit
Trust-mgmt
Green-bay