that goes well beyond the easy government solution. jesse: the president also responding to the shooting today. we are committed to working with state and local leaders to help secure our schools and tackled the difficult issue of mental health. later this month, i will be meeting with the nations governors and attorney general s who are making our schools we are making our schools and our nation saved saver will be our top priority. it is not making any actions that will make us feel like we are making a difference, we must actually make that difference. jesse: so, juan, you were mentioning at the commercial break about this guy s mental profile. he had just lost both of his parents. where do you see that factoring in? in other words, for a young
within his ability to change american policy with regard to immigration. that s kind of a whole government solution. i don t think we need to blame that on one person. look, fair discussion, go to merit base for economic advantage rather than these other criteria which were more based upon family relationships. that s a legitimate discussion. when the president says we need to do even more extreme vetting, do you know what that would look like? it makes me a little uncomfortable. it has the ring of the campaign more than the strategy, falling back ton language that president trump used last summer as he was running for president. look, we need to vet. we need to be very very careful. al wa there s another factor here as well. ke can t appear to be working against them and their interests. this is a radicalized individual.
structural hurdles it s challenging. is there a government solution you sew? i was going to ask the economist on the couch what accounts for this? the economy is doing fairly wel- people are optimistic about the economy. more optimistic about the economy then other things in the country. i think part is the personal debt. this culture of spending and the newest gadget. what are the struck cal economic things you talk about. yes. the problems. i look at my husband s home down outside of buffalo. they had a big big plant there that made stuff for gm. guess what all that stuff has gone to mexico or it s gone to asia those people don t have jobs. it s like a ghost town now. being squeezed in the middle. if you re rich you can pay for school. if you re poor enough you get
solution involves government. and not every government solution has to take place from our nation s capitol. many of them occur at the state and local level. by constitutional design, most of them should. sandra: all right. so we re going to have to keep our eye on the president in spring field, missouri, where he s expected to speak. senator lee, before i let you go, corporate tax rate. gary cohn said he ll push for lowest possible corporate tax rate. where does it end up? ideally it should go to 0. the corporate tax rate ends up being paid for by the poor and middle class in america. i suspect it will end up somewhere between 20%, 25%. should be lower. sandra: senator lee, thanks for being here. thank you. sandra: we will be following the president s every moment as he steps up on that stage, we will go to it live. we re also watching breaking developments happening in texas where mass evacuations are under way in the eastern texas cities of beaumont and port arthur. rescue
sharing reductions that was never appropriated by the congress that passed the affordable care act, and previous congress, and now we have a new congress and new white house who are still engaged in a legal battle with the attorneys general, and concerns that neither party wants to fight for the cost sharing reductions. about the cost sharing reductions, and it is important for people to understand what they are, they are a government solution to a government-created problem. the reason that we have high out of pocket costs because when the government said that insurance plans have to cover a-b-c-d, the insurers looked to narrow the networks or cut the coverage on other a areas. and peter, so what is your reflection on the latest decision? i noticed that particularly the courts ruled with some economic emphasis that without protection, each state could be burden tord bankrued or bankrupg