anything about them in an open court. so i was not surprised that the department decided that it had enough against julian assange not to pursue this other matter as it s called, the classified vaults documents. that doesn t surprise me. what does surprise me is the government s decision and the justice department s decision to go after julian assange for parts of the espionage act that really put a lot of journalists in danger. now, first of all, i want to tell you i do not believe that julian assange is a journalist. if he worked for the new york times, the washington post and had encouraged sources, taught them how to crack a pass code to get into a government database, they d be fired. so julian assange is not a responsible journalist. that being said, the government
this late leads me to believe that it was either destroyed originally or i m trying to get my head around whether this is cruelty or inkoch tense or both, but there is something that now is sinister about the fact that we are dna testing these people. i get that thags right. they are multiple organizations that are saying that you are violating the right of a child because you re asking them to provide to consent to their dna and putting it in a government database. at this point in time, people are trusting the government lez. there are 80,000 daca recipients that came out of the shadows that may face deportation under the government. the idea that now you going to collect people s dna and trust this government that they re going to do right by it is really a long sfretretch. this whole conversation, yabt say it enough. i say it every day, as many times as i m on tv. it s not actually illegal to be
this leads you to believe that it was destroyed originally or not properly taken in. i m trying to get my head around whether this is cruelty or imcompetence or both. that s exactly right. they are basically saying you are violating the rights of the child because you are asking them to provide to consent to their dna and putting it in the government database. at this point in time, frankly, people are trusting the government less. let s not forget, there are 800,000 daca students that may face deportation from this government. the idea you will collect people s dna and trust this government to do right by them is really a strong stretch. but this whole conversation, i can t say it enough, i say it every day.
i m trying to get my head around whether this is cruelty or imcompetence or both. that s exactly right. they are basically saying you are violating the rights of the child because you are asking them to provide to consent to their dna and putting it in the government database. at this point in time, frankly, people are trusting the government less. let s not forget, there are 800,000 daca students that may face deportation from this government. the idea you will collect people s dna and trust this government to do right by them is really a strong stretch. but this whole conversation, i can t say it enough, i say it every day. it s not actually illegal to be an asylum seeker.
through a government database that we had to sue the government of puerto rico along the center of investigative journalism in puerto rico to gain access to. help t harvard researchers found the death toll would be 70 times what the government is reporting. for the government of puerto rico s part, they say they are waiting for a study out of george washington university. they have asked for official review and once that is complete they may change the death toll. they say they don t plan to make changes to hurricane maria s death toll. we are so glad that you are staying on this and that your investigation and reporting is bringing us the truth about what happened at maria. thank you very much. so this was a fun holiday show. what are you doing for the rest of the day? sleeping, fourth of july tradition. i ll be grilling out,