the real issue is give people the freedom of whether or not they want to have a good job to be able to take care of their family first. if you don t have that first, then their only alternative is some government assistance program. but those on minimum wage can t afford health insurance. and the other piece of the argument, if you don t have insurance, you can t afford insurance, the only way you can get health care is to show up at the emergency room. what about the freedom of people paying their premiums every month? they re paying for the uncompensated people showing up at emergency rooms. i want to talk about the minimum wage jobs that you want to focus on. sounds like you d rather have no job than a minimum wage job. no, definitely not. let s talk about the number of jobs created in the state of texas. 30% of all the jobs created in america were created in texas in the last ten years. some of those were minimum wage jobs. but if you know the statistics,
cheryl as an alternative idea. point me somewhere in the constitution that it said anything about charity. it does not. founders of ah such jerks they didn t want to put that? no, charity should be privately motivated and working for money? that is called a job and not a government assistance program. it is a government hand out program . tracey is actually race it is race-dependent and discourages actual charit competent wastes capitol. there is a government system that is broke and paying and called welfare. tracey, you have to say though that a lot of people need help and they fall on hard time need a window to get themselves back on their feet. absolutely, cheryl. why not at the same time offer them a skill or trade. let s help them get back in society and earn a living. earn their own way. that s what the law is all about. but states are cutting back