Cross talking ukraine, im joined by my guess, matthew and rent in montreal. Hes a senior fellow at the American University in moscow and director of the Rising Tide Foundation of canada and franklin. We have ryan christian. He is founder and editor of the last American Vagabond and host of the daily wrap up. And here in moscow we crossed to johnny miller. He is a press tv correspondence, right job in cross lock, rolls and effects. That means you can jump anytime you want. And i always appreciate matthew, let me go to you 1st. I mean, one of the things i find really fascinating about this completely unnecessary war is how the west has tried to sell it to the world and to its own people. And you know, we, when we are you currently, ukraine will weigh a new crane is winning. Well, now we dont hear this anymore. We, we hear russia is lost, but by implication, does that mean ukraine has one safety business . This hold discursive, manipulation doesnt make any sense. And its not naming a lot
Your argument case 221219, leless versus the department of commerce. Marston martin as. Mister chief justice, may it please the court. For too long chevron has distorted the judicial process and undermined stato inrpretation. It should be overruled for three reasons, first, cheon violates the constitution. Article 3 a pers judges to say what the law is. It requires them to interpret federal statutes using their stnd independent judgment. Chevron undermines that du. It reallocate interpreti authorities from courts to agencies and forces courts to adopt inferior agency constructions that are issued for political or policy reasons. In doingso, chevron blocks judges from serving as faithful agents of congress. It mandates judicial biaan encourages agency overreach. By removing key checks on ecutive power it threatens individual liberty. Chevron also violates the apa, the most straightforward reading of section 706 requires review of legal questions. Congre put constitutional and statutory
On many essential attributes of a plan. It would be extremely challenging too used to document as a document to hold the iris, the Treasury Department, or anybody else accountable for missteps. The few things it almost entirely lax are quantitative targets to measure against, backup data to analyze, and various key operational details including, for example, who at the irs or Treasury Department is ultimately responsible for making decisions on any particular issue. This does not give any detail on how the irs will implement secretary yellens 400,000 dollar pledge. And details really matter here. It also does not estimate what any of the 42 initiatives or 190 odd key projects are expected to cost or clearly answer the basic question of which initiative or key projects can be fully implemented with the 80 billion dollars in funding. What the document quietly admits is astonishing. Despite contrary rhetoric, the irate did not give the irs enough funding to fully realize the plans divisio
On many essential attributes of a plan. It would be extremely challenging too used to document as a document to hold the iris, the Treasury Department, or anybody else accountable for missteps. The few things it almost entirely lax are quantitative targets to measure against, backup data to analyze, and various key operational details including, for example, who at the irs or Treasury Department is ultimately responsible for making decisions on any particular issue. This does not give any detail on how the irs will implement secretary yellens 400,000 dollar pledge. And details really matter here. It also does not estimate what any of the 42 initiatives or 190 odd key projects are expected to cost or clearly answer the basic question of which initiative or key projects can be fully implemented with the 80 billion dollars in funding. What the document quietly admits is astonishing. Despite contrary rhetoric, the irate did not give the irs enough funding to fully realize the plans divisio