Have done for years victor studying post traumatic disorder whether an accident witnessing other violence or combining nadine work and doing the chin piece of addressing this and boats on the ground and creating what i think of really the model we should be talking about in terms of urban model. Congratulations to everyone this is a proud moment and now the mayor of our great city mayor ed lee clapping. pamela thank you again for not only being here but loading this effort this is really, really heartfelt. I recognize a lot of the people in the room weve had a lot of discussions about poverty in San Francisco and how to really change it and end it in cycles but it against with the recognition as our attorney general has said we have to intervene more effectively its got to be multiple agencies. Im glad to see familiar faces from representatives in Nancy Pelosis office to our cheer and education leaders all part of this very i think collaborative effort it katie and other have put toget
Absorb this is an exist time. Since ive been on the board this is the beginning 6 my fourth term as a candidate many years ago mr. Harris was the District Attorney and both of those ladies said its one thing you got to do is get this center done. So you see the list of folks that have helped to gather and make this dream a reality the list is long but i want to give a moment to talk about my colleague who helped with this building come into fruition. Im filled with achievement. My talking points im told to focus on being on the bayview loins. Its existing about the Bayview Community the unparalleled trauma that young people as well as seniors and many people are exposed her here. I think that katie my nadine were exposed getting into the building. I remember having a candid conversation how could a community in so much pain fight something so good the answer is topple toxic shock the leaders for the last 40 years have experienced trauma they id like to take this opportunity wrap their
appreciate our diligence in this matter we have a 75 year history of providing surveyers and others in the city i don t know whether to wear a suit or whatever. they re maybe voices no option to this building project and they may have some concerns dealing effective with the forest north main we hope the committee will let this project move forward and we love the project and the love the challenges. thank you. good afternoon michael with local 6 in san francisco. we do hundreds of projects in this city when you look at the ditch it s 73 feet deep almost 5 acres and sewers going go across the city and across the center the san francisco and within 3 feet of those facilities. and what are the supervisors going to do to fix the hundreds of miles of sewers in this city. those pictures you showed earlier those are failures of the infrastructure that needs to be repaired and you should look at all the facilities to be up deteriorated. and rather than worrying about about the fo
addendum came out and my e-mail says we made adjustments and as far as the environmental impacts are concerned yes do we have other issues we need to address durable the construction yes, but those are different in this report you didn t feel it a need to send to planning? we created that four ourselves to negotiate with the developer if this project was to be approved and the long-term books next to our infrastructure and did you have discussions with anyone senior to you about whether to encourage the department to put out addendums we have nothing here. i don t understand your question. in other words your decision to tell the puc were your opinions and - and there was a lot of discussion with staff within the city attorney s office that the e-mail was vetted among us it was our collective conclusion the eir was fine as draft. and the controversy was the content of the e-mail and you had to tell me the planning depth of the risks. those risks are all ones we wo
you could have a 5 minute google search. it s amazing to see all the attention that this is getting. all this attention being fblgd on this one project. the level of questions being asked could only makes sense if there were a technical question rather than a political question the one thing i didn t hear did anything the city departments differentiate where best practic practices. i worked 10 years and helped write which of those reports i cannot understand the technical issues how small it is this is a very standard small issue we have look good engineers and we pay them this is a political hearing on eight washington project. thank you good afternoon. local union 104. i agree i understand you re certain about this sewer but i mean as we saw we have bigger wishes an aging structure here. you heard the developer say he s got qualified engineers and i think we should look at the overall benefits of this project it s going to revitalize that area a dirt lot that s currently