back their debt? president biden tweeting moments ago this, unthinkable. this fight isn t over. i ll have more to announce when i address the nation this afternoon. and on the final day of pride, the court backed a web designer opposed to same-sex marriage saying the business owner has a free speech right under the constitution s first amendment to refuse to endorse messages she disagrees with. lorie smith the graphic designer just celebrated her win in our last hour. this is a victory not just for me but for all of us. whether you share my beliefs or completely disagree with them, free speech is for everyone. but justice sotomayor in her dissent calls this ruling profoundly wrong and that today is a sad day in the lives of lgbt people. we re going to break down the massive legal and the political implications as well, by the way, for the court, congress, and the 2024 race for the presidency. we want to begin with the specifics of those two historic supreme court decisi
today on inside politics, two new rulings, two 6-3 decisions, two more sweeping changes to american life. the supreme court tilts the scales to the right on speech versus gay rights and on a signature biden policy to zero out student debt. plus, the ruling sparked fury in congress and celebration on the gop campaign trail. republicans say the justices ruled correctly. democrats say they are controlled by the maga right. and justice versus justice. the final day of the term sees another pair of on-the-bench trading jabs over law and life. i m dana bash. let s go behind the headlines and inside politics. up first, it is a new world defined by new math. 6-3, the supreme court ends its session with two more decisions and two more clear reminders that elections have consequences. donald trump put three justices on the bench, neil gorsuch, brett kavanaugh, and amy coney barrett. they have all ruled in the last two days to push the country right in ways that many of you will
hits his united states? i thinkjoe biden hits his policies, he is now sending troops hits his policies, he is now sending troops there. the question comes, joe biden s troops there. the question comes, joe biden s rhetoric says something different joe biden s rhetoric says something different. the disconnect of may arcos different. the disconnect of may arcos is different. the disconnect of may arcos is acting outside of authority and not arcos is acting outside of authority and not listen to the president, i don t and not listen to the president, i don t think and not listen to the president, i don t think anybody can tell us our southern border is the secure is that it s southern border is the secure is that it s ever been. southern border is the secure is that it s ever been. there is most certainly a that it s ever been. there is most certainly a crisis that it s ever been. there is most certainly a crisis of that it s ever been. there is most cert
oh, yeah. beautiful every one of you with that precious snowflake. happy tuesday, everyone. so we re less than two weeks into the new year and not much has changed for 2023. i m still under 7% body fat. done. kill me. still writes at a fourth grade level. and the biggest threat on earth, big monster man. take this recent piece from axios which points to the former president as, quote, the risk that trumps all others. quote a second trump term would be far more radical than the first committed to stretching legal and governance boundaries and to pursuing retribution for the prosecutions he s been fighting since losing. trump s protectionist and isolationist tendencies would also nato while creating an opening for china as a global threat. he is unrivaled. so how is that a problem? i, for one, would like a second term that s more radical than the first. maybe we ll get that wall we were promised and i will get a cabinet position as secretary of abs. 7% body fat, maybe. yeah
in six weeks, come in whatever, well, we ended that. now they want to go back to the levels where we cut those folks that now provide that kind of help. this amounts to $22 billion cut in veterans health care. now they dispute this. they know where their actual proposal or exclusive protection for veterans, but they say it s unusual language we use with presidents these days, they say i m lying when i say that. the truth is, why do so many veterans groups speak out in opposition to the republican proposal, they re not all democrats, they know what s going to happen. folks, that s a game republicans are playing, anytime you single out the impact of their overall cuts, they tell you, no, no, no, it s not true. but they re wrong. they want to protect something. they would have written it down and say we re protecting it. you can t cut this program. you can t cut it. so he can see it. here s another example. under the republican plan, nationwide, 100,000 teachers and support staf