Public has asked for, tmg, agreed to two events a year two could be scheduled in advance the others would be 30 days of the planned event, when there is no other conflicting event planned for this space, it would be added with no cost to the fee so they would have to pay for security, Janitorial Services etc. And the groups would have to get all the necessary permits but were pleased that tmg has made this into a public space. We have been port staff and tmg, and premier structures their joint venture partner, have been communicating, with the commission today today, you are asked to make an on the burden act, the port has gone to the state commission and ask them to issue a letter, finding a project consistent with the public trust. Exhibit d, to your staff report, includes, trust analysis in consultantation with tmg, and land state commission and that further the purpose of the trust or land time use that will be available for water taxi Public Access on the north apron the spraunt u
Value to the port of 1. 4 million here the internal rate of the return case, would be about 16 . This is a graphic showing exactly what i showed on the bar chart just in a pie, to show you where the share of revenue is coming from in the low and high case and we only changed one factor that was the number of special events. When we were here last commissioner woo ho asked about where the revenue is coming from in the project i think you were right commissioner woo ho we were over stating the importance of special events in the economic of the project, when its really the Office Revenue is the economic driver in the project, its just that special events flows to net cash flow thats why its the difference between the base and high case you will see in the low case five events a year 46 of the revenue is generated from the office use 20 from the restaurant and 13 from special events. In the high case 20 events per year special events grows to 38 , office, 48, and restaurant at 14 . Tmg in
Them to issue a letter, finding a project consistent with the public trust. Exhibit d, to your staff report, includes, trust analysis in consultantation with tmg, and land state commission and that further the purpose of the trust or land time use that will be available for water taxi Public Access on the north apron the spraunt use, and now the event use, the publicly oriented event use in parcel c. In closing, the port staff recommended rationale for lease approval includes the following the project meets, the rfp goals of bulkhead restoration rehabilitation use and services and ongoing port revenue today, we believe it balances, appropriately risk and award, this is an old facility there are conditions, risks our partner is making a substantial investment we think there a good balance for both the port and tm g. Through a long term lease like this we will reduce part harbor Fund Obligation with capital backlog, insurance claims, we believe we have come up with interesting, financial
A couple things, in terms of whether its appropriate to fund a capital need thats technically in a Enterprise Department with a general obligation i appreciate your acknowledgment that that is something weve done in the past and were planning to do it again in november by having a bond for muni, which is an Enterprise Department. I appreciate that acknowledgment. I guess my question is also, with streetlights, you made a comment about how this has somehow been an issue, but the fact is we have a Capital Asset that happens to be skidding inside the puc and Enterprise Department, but the department has been completely unable to care for this asset. Not because of lack of desire to care for it, but because they have no funds essentially to take care of these beyond a very basic maintenance program. I guess the question is how do we think about that when you have an asset in an Enterprise Department that has just deteriorated. And i would add to that, that i have heard from the puc particu
President of the board is taking part in those discussions, but now its to the board and were hearing about it for the first time and were having a conversation that is probably more appropriate to have in the planning committee. One thing im thinking about is is there a way to build up a structure so we can have these discussions in a place where they really should happen and hear where the board should be finalizing and adding to what should be in a bond. In my district, the issue of lighting the huge. I have very dark streets, i dont have a large commercial corridor that illuminates other parts of the district. Street crime is something thats real. Lighting is one way that we want to get to be able to resolve those issues. Im considering greatly thinking about how we can increase the lighting facilities we have. This could be a good process. Right now, the Capital Planning process is one thats very archaic. Supervisor wiener. Thank you. I just have a few follow up questions. First,