that s really neil: i know you re not an accountant. of these so-called crimes might have come at a time when you didn t have to pay taxes on benefits or perks that companies gave you. the companies themselves would pay the taxes. a lot we don t know about that. it keeps coming back to this is it? am i missing something that could be leading to a separate head shake here? what do you think? right, no that s true. first of all, what they re investigating generally is ubiquitous among corporations. corporations undervalue assets for tax purposes and overvalue them for loan purposes. it happens. in terms of benefits, you would have to frog march most of the corporate executives out of
the folks who participated in it hated it. and thought it was miserable. i would ask you all to consider the possibility that donald trump s brand is probably strong enough as it is and doesn t need help. it s not the most recognizable name in the english language and in the world. oh my gosh. hundreds of people it s laughable. hundreds go to the g7 meetings. if any contracting officer of the government had steered business to himself we would frog march them out of the building. indict them and give them a prison sentence. this is improper. let s stop talking about profit. the clause is not about profit. it s revenue. any money he gets. and trumps resort is in trouble. documents that were filed in effort to lower property taxes show the business is fallen off severely.
but i would suggest he doesn t need any help with his brand. was that the perfect place? in fact, i understand the folks who participated in it hated it and thought it was a miserable place to have to g-7. i mind simply ask you will to consider the possibility donald trump s brand is probably strong enough as it is and doesn t need anymore help on that. it s the most recognizable name in the english language and probably around the world right now. oh, my gosh, i mean hundreds of people it s laughable, right? hundreds of people go to these g-7 meetings. don, if any contracting officer of the government had steered business to himself we would frog march them out of the building, indict them and after they d been convicted of judgment give them a prison sentence. and let s talk about profits. the emoluments clause is not about profits. it s revenue. any money he gets. and trump s doral is in trouble. documents that the washington
or not president trump should be impeached and removed from office. that has gone up from june, 42%, now it is 47%. and that s jumped up ten points among independents. president trump is out there actually talking about this threat of impeachment using it as a political tool to keep the democrats from retaking the house and senate. and for good reason. because two-thirds of the democrats in this poll say there is cause to do impeachment proceedings. if they take the house, i know what nancy pelosi says today, but she is not going to be able to hold back a blood thirsty majority that got elected on the backs of people that believe they are going to frog march donald trump out of the white house. so they re going to impeach him have you seen enough facts to impeach president trump? i don t think so. they re not at that point yet. and i don t think that the i think the democrats recognize how much it would be overreach. the thing about this poll, it s
congressman devin nunes fighting back. because there is a bias against conservatives and republicans all across this country. these companies, facebook, google, apple, et cetera, are they monopolies? and should they be rned in? i would hope we don t have to go there. i would hope that they don t get involved in politics and don t censor conservatives and republicans but if they continue to do it, then we have t move obviously to hearings on these issues. kennedy: slowed down, captain antitrust. kevin mccarthy also had this to say. because this is disgusting. at the one i know is is a bias has got to stop. if it continues along the way, this might want to see more transparency. let s get all the facts and let s put a clear aim of the direction that we think is right for the american public. kennedy: what do you do? do you frog march every tech ceo before congress like mark zuckerberg and make them explain to some of our golden