should do, not just consider doing. well, i want to commend governor kay ivey for her strong alabama. yes, in her state. and to answer your question in a word, yes, we need to help people understand that this freedom argument is is is bunk. i mean, at the end of the day, we are losing freedoms because people are unvaccinated. and i don t want to shame anyone who has questions because, every day, i talk to people. i talked to at least five people today who had questions, and helped them get their questions answered and move them towards vaccinations. but people need to understand the real consequences. and the consequences are, as i said last week, more mitigation and as i m telling you this week, i am predicting closures, in the future, because we are not going to be able to reign this variant back in, before we get enough spread that is going to start causing closures, again. and so, i don t want my kids to have to go through another year of virtual school.
i m not going to sit here and tell you that we re going to catch all bad content in our system. we don t check what people say before they say it and frankly, i don t think society should want us to. freedom means you don t have to ask for permission first. that of course was facebook mark zuckerberg during a live stream address last week right at the social media giant finds itself caught up in investigations into russian interference during the 2016 u.s. election. this freedom argument is hard to argue with, but the problem is that facebook is so big and so influential, i think bigger than network tv, that it might need to be regulated like other media companies. in a sign of the times, facebook says russian operatives placed $100,000 in political ads and created fake accounts on its
it to me. pinterest and the freedom argument i am not adverse to that argument on though libertarians side make it is a good and a service and supply and demand i can appreciate that argument but i think the social cost is far too high that legalize prostitution to decriminalize tears at the social fabric in and of say that once the door is open if you legalize prostitution it is a gift to pence and six traffickers. john: if it is legal you don t need up camp. hugh had hidden and child prostitution it opens the door to a lot of darkness. john: s.a. in the opposite is true. that happens weather in the dark but if it is legal there is no darkness but
to explain it for me. explain. i am not adverse to the freedom argument. which you on the libertarian side make this is a good and service there s a demand and supply but the social cost is far too high. de criminalizing pros cushion tears at the social fabric in a way that once that door is open you can t restore. it is a gich it is a gift to sex traffickers. if it s legal you don t need a pimp. even where it is legal you get an increase in hidden illegal and chile prostitution as well. it opens the door to darkness. child prostitution is darkness. it is secret. where things are legal you don t
radio host here volunteers to explain it to me. look i understand the freedom argument and i m not averse to that argument which libertarians make. this is a good service, it s a demand and supply for it. i can appreciate that argument but i think the social cost is far too high that decriminalizing it tears at the social fabric in a way once that door is open you can t restore. when you legalize it, it s a gift to pimps and sex traffickers and the sex industry. if it is legal you don t need a pimp. even where it is legal you get a increase in hidden illegal and child prostitution as well. it opens a door to darkness. where things are legal you don t have darkness. what we do have from studies,