retaliation for organizing. the man was fired for distributing leaflets in the parking lot. in 2019, a self described venomous started a twitter account of musk on a jet, and then he blocked him. the teenager was not doing anything wrong. in february of this year, still a month before musk started calling hills south a free speech absolutists. testified one of their employees who had a youtube channel where he reviewed self-driving cars. he owned a tesla and candidly reviewed the car. not only did testifier him, they also cut off his access to the tesla self-driving software in a vehicle he owns. elon musk does not appear to be a guy of absolute for speech. he has the right to buy whatever he likes and runs his company however he likes, but we do not have to buy his nonsense story about saving
the others when they have such a dominant space in this market. a lot of free speech absolutists say this is all an attempt by the media and people in the government to suppress debate, to stifle dissension. what do you make of that? obviously there are free speech concerns here. we don t want people to feel like they can t voice their opinion, even if it s an unpopular opinion. by the same token, there are clear detrimental effects to letting human trafficking or lies about vaccines take root. yeah, jake, i m so glad you brought that up because that free speech concern is something facebook wants everybody fixated on. it means everyone gets stuck in a debate about what you are and are not allowed to say and you can see how lawmakers and the american public can be mired in that for decades to come. what these documents point to and what the facebook whistleblower has encouraged people to focus on is facebook s