will: yeah, claims that he is science, and also censoring anyone that dare question my of the edicts of science including in this case did you do any cost benefit analysis of masking kids? no. where d you come up with 5-6? if i don t know. it just kind of emanated. rachel: i think the real question, the most important although i don t want to minimize the masking of children which i think was cruel and and i think ran walsh but tyrannical, but the involvement of the u.s. government, the nih, in funding even if they did it in a back door way and tried to launder it through ecohealth, his friend s company, if there was an involvement of the u.s. government in the funding of gain of function research at the wuhan lab. there s no way that something that huge could have happened without his knowledge. and if he did that and if then he didn t alert everybody about the u.s. involvement because he kept saying it was a bat and it was this and it was natural so that it would get everyone off
Will
Case
Science
Anyone
Cost-benefit-analysis
Kids
Masking
Question-my
Edicts
Dare
5
6