her private e-mail or her public e-mail, official e-mail, it doesn t really matter, she still has the ability as every other official in the executive branch to make determinations as to what are official e-mails and what are private e-mails. the virtue of the fact that she s using a private e-mail server doesn t really complaining what the substance of her response would be to a foyer request. let me show you something that michael mukasey, former attorney general wrote this week about this matter, he said it is a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment by not more than a year, to keep documents or materials to keep e-mails or classified information at an undisclosed location. the issue does not turn on whether they bear a classified marking. did he get it right? kind of, he s not really giving you a full explanation.
with document production. when that key individual was there at the irs when that scandal was unfolding and we were trying to get documents from lois lerner 422 tapes destroyed and now she is here. judicial watch filled and they have had success and the judge is now demanding these documents within a week. will it happen? the courts have been helpful in the foyer request and times we have been trying to get information. it has been an outside group demanding it going to the judge, and the judge gets them there. i think it is a good thing. they better comply with the court. if they don t they are in trouble. we will see then. republican from ohio thank you for being here in new york. the president s handling of the controversial nuclear deal
e-mails coming out. we know of the 55,000 pages that hilary clinton turned over as secretary of state for that foyer request because the judge ordered it 296 of the e-mails are benghazi related. what do they say? we are taking a look at it and we will brickng you the news right after the break. the sunshine vitamin! ensure. take life in.
you the addresses and one of the addres was public, anyway. so. in that whole process we found out that there are separate email accounts. and they are subject to the freedom of information act, congressional inquiries, but we haven t been able to verify that. greta: if they say they are subject to foyer request and they don t respond after 90 days or cost you $1 million, they have made it impossible to verify whether or not they are subject to the foyer if they are not forthcoming. right. tried to do, like we do with this administration, previous administration, we unbelievable transparency, we want to ask the government what it knows because we are taxpayers and weve paid forinformation and we have a right to look at the novembers. in our view, we asked for the email adesses, simple list, you go to the server and say, who are the people with email acco the server. we asked for the list.
i meatucker. that is true. this is by nevada admonition secret. the previous administration was secretive. this was a key rational nor obama s presidential campaign in 2008. these guys are secretive, they are not telling you what they are doing. i will be different, i will have the transpaation, which five years on has turned out to be totally a false promise, it s even more a secretive administration by any measure, including by foyer request, this is not one person s opinion it s measurable. they are not turning over the data, it s a violation of law and they have to. bill: you mentioned transparency and you are exactly right about this tucker. november sorry january of 2009 that is all we heard time and again, where does that stand now. i agree there should be more transparency. i wouldn t say that was the primarily reason for his can dance see and that s all we heard but we do agree in principle that i would like to see more transparency in the administration. they should t