Hearings remotely. On may 29, 2020, the Mayors Office authorized all commissions to reconvene remotely. We request your patience in advance. The merged platforms are not perfect, and at times may even be clumsy. There are broadcast delays from the live event to sfgovtv, and the live event to those who are streamed, streaming the event live. I have been notified that sfgovtv is not currently broadcasting the event live on television. Again, members of the public may stream it live via their website and links. They will broadcast our hearing as soon as the Building Inspection Commission hearing concludes. To enable the public participation, sfgovtv will end up broadcasting, but it is streaming this hearing live and we will receive Public Comment for each item to todays agenda. The tollfree number to enter the hearing and to submit Public Comment is available by calling 1 888 2733658. Enter access code 3107452. And then press pound, and pound again. When you are connected and you would li
S. Fewer good afternoon. Well start with the meet and i welcome our councilors and president norman yee. Id like to thank our clerk and thank you sf gov tv for board offing this. Madame clerk. Clerk the city chamber and Committee Rooms are closed and others will be participating remotely. Caution is taken various local stayed and orders and directors. Well have the meeting through Video Conference and Public Comment will be available on each item on this agenda and theyre streaming the number across the screen. Each speaker will be allowed 10 minutes to speak. Opportunities to speak during Public Comment period are available via phone call by calling 415655001. Access code 145 254 1827 best practices are to speak clearly and alternately you can email for Public Comment and theyll be forwarded to the supervisor and included part of the file and items are expected to appear for the agenda june 17 than otherwise stated. S. Fewer call items one, two and three together. Clerk [reading items
Was 616 carolina street had not been twooieded. So no building in particular according to San Francisco has the 616 as the actual address. So the law firm felt that was appropriate to use this numbering when we went through the condominium process. Mr. Apalos purchased the front house in 2018, signed the t. H. C. Agreement. We assumed all along that this would be the street driveways numbering, but a couple of months ago when mr. Apalos went to the d. B. I. , we were informed that because you cannot have a new street address for a new building you cant have a new address for an existing building that the 616 would go to the front building. My feeling was that was a misinterpretation of the guidelines from the d. B. I. It says exactly that, you cannot reassign a new address to an existing building, but we were subdividing the property which had an address, but none of the individual buildings had an address. This has been my property for almost 30 years. This is where i vote, its my pas
Tenant. We are going to fulfill whatever agreement we did with the tenant. We are not thinking of doing any unlawful things. I dont think there is a landlordtenant situation. This is a situation where we want to work with the city to be granted permits to enhance the property. We have been following all the guidelines and all the rules and regulations. We know that we can have an access into the property. Because all the homes in this district are available to add one extra dwelling to the property per ordinance 1917 and this puts San Francisco in compliance with californias state law. So we made some changes on the plan. They addressed that we were missing something on the lower level. We corrected that. We think that we are in compliance with all the rules and regulations to expand the property and make a good property. We even when we paint the property we tried to match to the opera house that is like two blocks away. You have pictures. I think the property looks beautiful now comp
We came to an agreement and the agreement was i would keep the cottage in the back and 614, the other available number on the street would be assigned to the front of the property, the front house on the property. At the time, the entire property was 616 carolina street had not been twooieded. So no building in particular according to San Francisco has the 616 as the actual address. So the law firm felt that was appropriate to use this numbering when we went through the condominium process. Mr. Apalos purchased the front house in 2018, signed the t. H. C. Agreement. We assumed all along that this would be the street driveways numbering, but a couple of months ago when mr. Apalos went to the d. B. I. , we were informed that because you cannot have a new street address for a new building you cant have a new address for an existing building that the 616 would go to the front building. My feeling was that was a misinterpretation of the guidelines from the d. B. I. It says exactly that, you