Countering disInformation Campaigns. Officials from the Swedish Psychological Defense Agency spoke about Critical Thinking and resilience in moments of polarization. It is cohosted by the embassy of sweden and the Digital Forensics research lab. Good morning everyone. My name is karin olofsdotter. I have the great honor of serving as the ambassador for sweden for the u. S. You may wonder why youre in a black room. I thought the architect had run out of ideas and money but it is to show you how dark it is scandinavia in the wintertime. Dont let that put you off. Do come and visit our wonderful country. Its great for your you americans, drop travel it is wonderful to see so many of you today. Joining us online from. I want to thank the Council Digital Research Forensic lab for cohosting the event and to the Nobel Foundation and the National Academy of sciences, their partners and supporting organizations. Todays event is part of the nobel prize summit. Its a testament to the enduring leg
there. i have to go over there. she was a commander who cared. i was like, when are you doing. and she says, i m writing birthday cards to all my soldiers. her husband was a charming sergeant and devoted that. he was just as loving and doting as lyndon was. no one could believe it when this decorated officer was found dead in her own home. an army commander being murdered was unheard of. the first suspect, as usual, the husband. but this one had a rock solid alibi. it would have been very difficult for him to have committed this murder. this soldier have enemies off the battlefield? her brother in law had a grudge. rodney was going around calling her names, vulgar names. her husband had a girlfriend. roger was sitting with a young lady, and they were cut cuddled up. we found out that she was pregnant. who killed the commander? in a place where loyalty is prized above all, one clue. that palm print was a key part of the case. would reveal a brea
kind of got myself together and said we had to go over there. i had to go over there. she was a commander who caved. i was like what you are doing? she says i m writing for the cards to all of my soldiers. her husband was a charming sergeant and devoted dad. he was fitness loving and doting as she was. no one can believe it when this decorated officer was found dead in her own home. an army commander being murdered was unheard of. a first suspect as usual the, husband, but this one had a rock-solid alibi. it would have been very difficult for him to have committed this murder. this soldier have enemies off the battlefield? her brother in law had a grudge. rodney was going around calling her names, vulgar names. her husband had a girlfriend. roger was sitting with a young lady, and they were cut cuddled up. we found out that she was pregnant. who killed the commander? in a place where loyalty is prized above all, one clue. that palm print was
have to be consistent with each other and have to point conclusively to the guilt of alex murdaugh, beyond a reasonable doubt. these circumstances just raise more questions, ladies and gentlemen. raise more questions that we wouldn t have to be dealing with if they had just simply secured mag maggie s phone on june 8th when they got it. we wouldn t be here. we do know from the time line that alex left the property at 9:07. were they killed before he left? i don t know the answer to that. i don t know the answer to that. we do know that if he was in the house when the shots were made down at the kennel that he would not have heard them. we had testing from mr. sutton. they were angry with mr. sutton s not angry, but they challenged his conclusions on a lot of things. they didn t touch his acoustic testing. didn t doubt that. haven t challenged that. if he is in the house and shots are down at the kennel, he doesn t hear it. they say that sometime after 8:44 they peg it 8:4
newly appointed proprieor of that material as the new speaker of the house. that s despite the fact that he pointedly refused a lawful congressional subpoena from the 1/6 select committee last year. now in defending his decision to share 41,000 hours of previously unreleased footage exclusively with far-right insurrection-friendly personality tucker carlson, mccarthy is showing americans he either does not understand or does not care about the potential risk that decision presents. speaking with the washington post, mccarthy suggests this, that the public fury over the selective release isn t really about egregious security concerns. in fact, it s about jealous, he insisted on the part of the media at the heart of the outrage. hang on. it gets better. today politico is first to report that house republicans, many of whom have framed the 1/6 insurrection as the defendants in those criminal cases as victims of a political attack are now moving to provide those defendants acce