aren t going to be the ones sacrificing, but they are the ones who feel virtuous by doing all of this stuff and the consequences. i see it i see a pattern, a recurring theme here and i m just grateful for the clarity you provided finding right.ed i hope you ll come back . thank you .t. you bet. soso speaking of the people who are pushing for this with no regard to the consequences, one of them is called julia ioffe. she s one of the silliest leastt informed people in american p media. but that haseo not prevented her from becoming what passes f for a foreign policy authority on twitter. it s a very low bar. so aarp spends most of her timeh demanding that you send your children to war with russiaere and then attacking anyone who doesn t want to do that as a stooge of putin. you ve seen this a lot. julia ioffe, in other words, believes passionately in ukrainian nationalism and that would be fine except she doesn t believe in american nationalism, which is weird since she lives here. she
0 by istanbouli ticket to seattle . netwenty seven presenting partnr usa. good evening and welcome to tucker carlson tonight areld a lot of things going on around the world at the moment but we thought we would begin tonight with a report from oour own country just to give you something a little differentnt fromat what you ve been watching every moment of every day for the past three weeksksas on your screen are pictures fromyn brooklyn, new york . these are people waitingth in line at a food bank. the queue stretches for blocks. it s what we used to call a bread line. otst of these people are not homeless or not addicted tohe drugs. some of them have jobs they just can t afford enough food. very few living americans have ever seen anything like this . it s been nearly 100 yearses since the united states experienced widespread food shortages. that s long enough that most of us have forgotten what it means . and here s what it means. if you want to make a society volatile, not just an
paul. the president exercised his core foreign policy authority to talk to ukraine about investigating past corruption. whether you like it or dislike it as a matter also policy, that s within his constitutional wheelhouse. they are saying he could benefit politically from the investigation of mr. biden or biden s son. paul: and therefore he solicited a bribe is the claim. the reason it s incoherent is because in a democracy every elected politician, both political branches, then he or she tried to policy legislatively or foreign policy wise is always thinking about political consequences. under this logic, every president is committing an impeachable offense virtually every day including by the way as you point out in an excellent editor l y all, that editors the case with mr. biden.
foreign policy authority to talk to ukraine about investigating past corruption. whether you like it or dislike it as a matter also policy, that s within his constitutional wheelhouse. they are saying he could benefit politically from the investigation of mr. biden or biden s son. paul: and therefore he solicited a bribe is the claim. the reason it s incoherent is because in a democracy every elected politician, both political branches, then he or she tried to policy legislatively or foreign policy wise is always thinking about political consequences. under this logic, every president is committing an impeachable offense virtually every day including by the way as you point out in an excellent editor l y all, that editors the case with mr. biden.
money moved and didn t, but he does. so, you just don t like his motivations. and that is not a basis for impeachment. well, it s not just about not liking his motivations. i mean, those two theories, conspiracy theories, that you just launched, there s not a sing single shred of evidence to support either one of them. there s the underlying issue that the president should start at some point to figure these things out to listen to his advisers and the intelligence community. let s put that aside just for a minute. this isn t just like people disagree with the way he decides to go about conducting his foreign policy authority. this is a big step beyond that. this is an allegation that he s using that foreign policy authority one, to benefit himself politically, not to seek the country s interest. and that is certainly impeachable. and two, he s doing it in a way to invite foreign influence into our elections. and that is absolutely should be