Weathering an Employer's Duties During the Storm | Lowndes jdsupra.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from jdsupra.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Ex-WilmerHale Temp Says White House Atty Lied For Toyota
Law360 (February 18, 2021, 4:53 PM EST) A former WilmerHale attorney who now works at the White House has been subpoenaed after a former temp accused him of lying under oath to help Toyota cover up corrupt practices in Thailand, including hiding defects in some of its car models.
Michael Posada was subpoenaed Tuesday and is one of several former WilmerHale lawyers at the White House who have been called to testify in Florida state court in the case brought by Andrew Delaney, a former Big Law attorney who worked for a staffing agency under WilmerHale s direction on an internal investigation for Toyota.
Ex-WilmerHale Temp Says White House Atty Lied For Toyota law360.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from law360.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Tuesday, January 12, 2021
On December 31, 2020, the Florida Supreme Court rendered an opinion in
In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.1510, No. SC20-1490, aligning Florida’s rules of civil procedure with the supermajority of U.S. states and formally adopting the federal standard for summary judgment motions. The decision came on the heels of another case,
Wilsonart, LLC, et al. v. Lopez, No. SC19-1336 (Fla. Dec. 31, 2020), in which the Florida Supreme Court reviewed a trial court’s decision to weigh compelling video evidence against a conflicting eyewitness statement and grant summary judgment in the defendant’s favor.
In
On December 31, 2020, the Florida Supreme Court rendered an opinion in
In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.1510, No. SC20-1490, aligning Florida’s rules of civil procedure with the supermajority of U.S. states and formally adopting the federal standard for summary judgment motions. The decision came on the heels of another case,
Wilsonart, LLC, et al. v. Lopez, No. SC19-1336 (Fla. Dec. 31, 2020), in which the Florida Supreme Court reviewed a trial court’s decision to weigh compelling video evidence against a conflicting eyewitness statement and grant summary judgment in the defendant’s favor.
In
Wilsonart, Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s decision on appeal, relying on the state standard that the “slightest doubt” as to the potential existence of a genuine issue of material fact may enable the nonmoving party’s claims to survive. Because there had been, technically, conflicting evidence, the court of appeal