you are so sweet. thank you. happy mondaymonday. and hello, kamala. so we heard a lot the wall whent trump was in office, but there s another wall whend t comes to the border issue, the one between reality and what the media will report.e and it s a wall 50 times harder to breach the one trump was building. but finally, it looks like that wale thl crumbling like a wicker chair under ana navarro. we ve all seen the video. ckingw a dozen migrants attacking two cops in times square. the videtimeo seems to have brot through the media moat that protects the left and,ogres shown everyone what progressive policies on immigration reallyiv look like. and it s scarier thanjesse jesse watters without his and makeup. yeah. foppr thosort lae who support ld enforcement, the images have become like the famous rodney king vide o. but in reverse. and it s hard for us to all justalong whe se get when w the people we gave food, shelter and cash, then bea bt up our protectors. and now the
consecrated, i think. and i didn t go to mass. remember what i said about afghanistan? i said we get help froer whamd. the taliban. what s happening now? what s going to readi was your press? i wasright. right. less than 500 days untilthe the 2024 election and the left is finally to panic over biden s latest embarrassing stumbles. politico leading the way today with a new column. why should primary biden? the onus should be on bidensl to prove he s mentally and physically nimble enough to dallyo job for another termdo before he s allowed to run against the bestlicans h the republicans have to offer. besides putting him ine to fighting, trim or not. primary adversaries would prepare for the all too realreal possibility that he s incapacitated pos, by a stroke, seriously injured or even worseinjured . even wor the piece even addresses pre main reason biden neede eves a primary challenger, his vice president. is vicf kamala harris, hadnvince convinced the country that she
by the use of atomic bombs in a single night. i am afraid that the answer to that question is yes. - -(clock ticking) jon else: robert oppenheimer was the father of the atomic bomb. he was this complex ball of contradictions. oppenheimer: they are weapons of aggression, of surprise and of terror. richard rhodes: oppenheimer wanted the bomb to be used. how else would the world know what it was? eleanor roosevelt: dr. oppenheimer, are we creating something we may not be able to control? oppenheimer: in a world of atomic weapons, wars will cease. (ticking) newsreel narrator: it is d-minus one for the test of the world s first atomic device. else: this cultured, nonviolent man was responsible for birthing the most violent weapon in human history. and he devoted the rest of his life to trying to control the monster that he had unleashed. oppenheimer: if there is another world war. .this civilization may go under. kai bird: he became a political pariah. edward r. murrow: is it tru
hello, everyone, i amwith kennedy, along with jessica tarlov, katie pavlich, and big jim fail out, it s 5:00 in new york city, and this is the five. give us your poor, your tired, and your federal money, the leaders of three sanctuary cities areng begging president biden to shower themts with some cold hard taxpayer-funded cash.h as and they wind their hearts out over the big bad texas governor busting illegals to their doorsteps.rnoreps. we cannot continue to do the federal government s job, the federal government must take responsibility and lead on this humanitarian crisis, instead ofi leaving itng for cities and localities to handle. we need thee federal government to lean in, and provide more financial assistance. all of our cities have reached a point where we are either at constant capacity or nearly out erelof her room. we need more federal support toor be able to manage this amot of inflow. it will crush city budgetslook across the country. looking at $160
Jon else Robert Oppenheimer was the father of the atomic bomb. He was this complex ball of contradictions. Oppenheimer they are weapons of aggression, of surprise and of terror. Richard rhodes oppenheimer wanted the bomb to be used. How else would the world know what it was . Eleanor roosevelt dr. Oppenheimer, are we creating something we may not be able to control . Oppenheimer in a world of atomic weapons, wars will cease. ticking Newsreel Narrator it is dminus one for the test of the worlds first atomic device. Else this cultured, nonviolent man was responsible for birthing the most violent weapon in human history. And he devoted the rest of his life to trying to control the monster that he had unleashed. Oppenheimer if there is another world war. This civilization may go under. Kai bird he became a political pariah. Edward r. Murrow is it true that humans have already discovered a method of destroying humanity . cameras clicking else and it finally ruined him. Oppenheimer now i am