assault-style rifles, things like ak-47s. this set the gun companies up in arms. they were livid. they said nascar is alienating their fan base. they pointed to the overlap between nascar fans as well as gun owners. and we ve seen this trend. the company is re-evaluating their stance on whether or not they re willing to sell guns, how they want to partner with organizations like the nra. but things are a little murky when it comes to nascar. in part, because they won t publicly clarify their position. the gun companies pressed for more information about the gradual shift. i have reached out to nascar multiple times to say what does this mean about your approach to the willingness for the firearms companies. it is noteworthy to say that the nra has taken note of this
approach, don t want ads depicting assault style rifles, things like ak-47s, ar-15s, but are happy to take ads for less controversial accessories, maybe concealed carry classes. this set the gun companies up in arms, livid that nascar is alienating fan base, pointed to overlap between nascar fans and gun owners. and we have seen the trend of companies re-evaluating their stance on whether they re willing to advertise guns, whether they re willing to sell guns, how they want to partner with organizations like the nra. but things are still murky when it comes to nascar, in part because they won t clarify their position. gun companies pressed for more information on the gradual shift, i reached out to nascar multiple times to say what does it mean, the approach to second amendment issues, willingness to partner with firearms companies. nascar hasn t responded. it is worth pointing out, the
dumps except for firearms companies. it will drive people who might have hesitated to buy a gun, say they might become unavailable. so any more guns out there? >bill: you are saying this is no big deal. that s what i hear you saying. it is no big deal. if i get myself a business card and open up to store and say i m going to buy guns. they don t have to wait until i sell 10 of them to consider me a gun dealer. bill: so why do this? ask the white house, i have no idea. bill: why make the action? if you want to do something, this is something. and he s talking about change rules with regard to reporting
concerned with preserving massive sales of firearms for its, the firearms companies that support it. i think that s right. and you said, there is nothing in the law that suggests what they say is at all true. there is no basis for believing that this will lead to confiscation of guns or to or to infringement upon americans rights as secretary of state kerry reiterated this week. it s essential codified in the treaty which really is symbolic more than anything. it creates a set of international guidelines but not enforceable domestically in the united states. and you know, all of that being said. the nra isn t interested in talking about it. they want to hold a 100% line against anything that has to do with regulating firearms. you know one of the ironies here too is, they re political right loves to beat of on the united nations. they always portray it as a
clearly than most other examples that the nra is very much concerned with preserving massive sales of firearms for its, the firearms companies that support it. i think that s right. and you said, there is nothing in the law that suggests what they say is at all true. there is no basis for believing that this will lead to confiscation of guns or to or to infringement upon americans rights as secretary of state kerry reiterated this week. it s essential codified in the treaty which really is symbolic more than anything. it creates a set of international guidelines but not enforcible domestically in the united states. and you know, all of that being said. the nra isn t interested in talking about it. they want to hold a 100% line against anything that has to do with regulating firearms. you know one of the ironies here too is, they re political right loves to beat of on the united nations. they always portray it as a