Not equate Higher Education with the ministry of science. Your statement is correct. What is the number of students in the countrys Higher Education . Ministry of health, which is not subordinate to the ministry of science therefore, the student population of Higher Education in the country is 3 million and about 240 thousand students, of these 3 million and 240 thousand students, about 1 million and 20 to 30 percent of them are islamic azad university. Specialized such as Sharif University, Community Universities such as Tehran University and National Universities such as technical Vocational University , applied scientific university, Payam Noor University , our population is about one and a half million here. The rest is divided between universities affiliated to the executive branch and 1. 1 million 200 thousand universities the number of people can be up to 3 million 200. There are approximately 500 ministries of science in the executive bodies of the highaltitude core. Yes, the m
Of payam noor university, about one and a half million of our population is here, the rest is divided between the universities affiliated to the executive body and the universities of half a million, 200,000 people, it is 2,700 to 3,200,000. Almost the ministry of science is in the executive body. The core of this population is actually the explanation of our student population to you, the 45,000 people you mentioned. 45 the effort of 45 thousand billion tomans that you said is only for this one million and 500 thousand Knowledge Based on a part of that one and a half which is from the day students funded by the organization of the next program, it was spent, first of all , it is for Teaching Research in the Day Department and to compensate part of the expenses of secondtime students , which in this 1 million and 500 are about 700 thousand secondtime students. Well, now lets go back to the main question, is this allocation fair, mr. Doctor . You ask the doctor exactly to say, no, it is
And we are pleased to have three members of the house today to talk about their report and here reactions from notable experts on the programs. But first, and perhaps most importantly, we are going to start outside of washington. And hear from experts in the field of helping lowincome americans moving up. They work in places far removed from the halls of congress about their work has informed some of the ideas contained in the steering committees report. I have a special affinity for these outside of washington experts, as that is where i worked prior to coming to washington. I spent 19 years working in social Service Agencies in the state and city of new york and i have some idea of the dedication, hard and wisdom of people who work in peace programs, and i always love to be among them. So im very pleased to welcome and introduce to you the first panel which features three 3 mef communitybased organizations. First will be owed l. Cleveland the Administrative Officer for the Baptist Ch
Death penalty and my name is dale. I teach law at georgetown and to run a Supreme Court practice. We are here to talk about the Death Penalty, where its going and i cant imagine a better group of panelists. Over here is the president of the Southern Center for human rights. You know in my mind the leading Death Penalty litigants in the country. And has been for a number of years traveling throughout the country to bring these cases. He had a big one in the Supreme Court or couple weeks ago ago which may be i will tell you a little bit about that hes been teaching at Yale Law School since 1993 which yesterday was significant because that was my first class on the Death Penalty which he taught and was just a marvelous in its rationale figure and its a delight to be here with him. Roy adams is the director of the center for effective justice of the texas Public Policy center. Mark does interesting work in the cause of the criminal Justice System and is making the case for a conservative c
Pastor since 2012 and to say parishioners dont like him is an understatement. Theres an online petition calling for his ouster and a website with a long list overgreens. Hes supposed to be the leader of this parish, hes supposed to be the shepherd. How can you do that. How can you put somebody here that has these terrible accusations. The lawsuit goes even further, alleging mcquellly used church fund to buy this house in brick new jersey and that the money has fueled a lavish lifestyle for the 53 yearold priest and his alleged boyfriend. Father mcquellly wasnt around today but the Office Manager at the rectory came to his defense. Whatever they say is up to them, its their choice to say whatever they choose to say. People who do not know facts can be ignorant. And the archdiocese says it has investigated many of these allegations and says if theres any wrongdoing they have found no proof of it. Well have much more on that in another live report coming up at 5 30. Eyewitness news. Thank