court to the federal court. how does this play? reporter: it could, sara, they were going to continue to argue their case should be in federal court because they were federal officials at the time of the charges, the al glegations what they were doing for donald trump after the election. they say that everything they were doing were things that wouldn t have been done if they had not been federal officials working for donald trump at that time. but there is really a fight brewing here we re going to see spill over into court on monday at a hearing where mark meadows and jeffrey clark may have to present evidence about what they were doing. we know the district attorney is ready to call witnesses about that call that trump placed to secretary of state brad raffensperger in georgia to find votes after the election. and this is gearing up to be quite a series of days for these two men, because others who were working for trump, rudy giuliani, jenna ellis, sidney powell, have turned them
steve: listen to this. there s a fight brewing in new jersey where essentially it s the new jersey governor phil murphy s own backyard. the dispute is three school districts there. one of them in a town where murphy lives implementing new policies to require schools to november rather, to november parents if their child formally wanted to change their gender identity, pronouns, or name, use different bathrooms or even change the gender of sport teams they play on. joining us now are parents and school board members of the middletown district, frank capone and jacqueline tobacco. good morning to both of you. good morning. thanks for having us. you bet. jacqueline, this started about a year ago. explain. it did. we had been in a policy meeting and heard from the administration that test scores were being the names were being whited out to send home to parents and we were a little
and january 6th. the reason it s up to the judge is because there s been a fight brewing for a couple days, where the justice department has wanted to put a nondisclosure provision on all of the evidence it may turn over to donald trump that he hasn t seen before and hasn t been in the public sphere. trump s baulawyers hit back on monday night saying they don t think what the prosecutors, what the justice department is proposing, as far as nondisclosure agreements go is fire. they don t want to infringe on donald trump s free speech abilities. there s going to be a determination made by tanya chutkan in federal course, about exactly how evidence should be handled as it gets turned over and both sides are prepare ing r trial. that s the legal argument. there s also some political sniping that s happening. that s because the justice
answer is, no. it is not stopping illegal immigration. boris. rosa flores, thank you so much. we should the snnote this was v actually taken today, not far from the spot. you see migrants coming into the united states. a legal fight brewing, jim, over something that ultimately isn t that effective, it appears. well, let s look at the numbers of people coming across the border or attempting to come across the border so far this year. according to u.s. border and customs encounters along the southern borders are down. they peaked last december 250,000. now, they re below 150,000. this is per month. in fact, those numbers continue to decline, even after title 42 was lifted in may. title 42, you ll remember, dates back to the trump administration, pandemic regulation, that allowed the government to turn folks back because of pandemic concerns. at the time when it was lifted there were concerns numbers were going to jump up, surge, as a result of that move.
investigation related to the classified documents case. what did they say? right now in that case, there s a fight brewing over the trial date. the justice department wants one in december. that might be a little early. that s just the end of this year. trump s team wants the case to be postponed indefinitely because he s running for president and they have a couple of other reasons there thewant time to go through things, but the justice depa came back swinging pretty hard at trump s defense people saying that there s no basis in law or fact to postpone this case indefinitely. they want to get to trial very quickly here or as quickly as they can, and there s a hearing on tuesday when the judge is going to see both of the parties for the very first time. there is a possibility she could want to address this at that time, and a big question that she s going to have to determine is how do you seat a jury for a man who s running for president? trump s team says, you just can t while he