you re saying that the president is actually not able to think. well, the problem, lawrence, isn t just that his sentences don t parse and that his pronouns float around in search of antecedents and not just that he s sintactically challenged, eisenhower was. it is not just that he s given to verbal fender benders. george w. bush had his share of those. the question is whether or not the way he talks and the judgments he makes about matters of fact, history, for example, suggest that he really is not capable of sequential thought which is rather alarming in a president. you add that to the fact that his demonstrated lack of knowledge of american history, his recent talk about andrew
many of us have thought in different ways but most of us haven t found the way to put it into words. you re saying that the president is actually not able to think. well, the problem, lawrence, isn t just that his sentences don t parse and that his pronouns float around in search of antecedents and not just that he s challenged and eisenhower was and i think his 0 pastie sometimes tactical. it is not just that he s given to verbal fender benders. george w. bush had his share of those. the question is whether or not the way he talks and the judgments he makes about matters of fact, history, for example, suggest that he really is not capable of sequential thought which is rather alarming in a president. you add that to the fact that his demonstrated lack of knowledge of american history, his recent talk about andrew jackson angry about a civil war that occurred 16 years after he
different ways but most of us haven t found the way to put it into words. you re saying that the president is actually not able to think. well, the problem, lawrence, isn t just that his sentences don t parse and that his pronouns float around in search of antecedents and not just that he s challenged and eisenhower was and i think his 0 pastie sometimes tactical. it is not just that he s given to verbal fender benders. george w. bush had his share of those. the question is whether or not the way he talks and the judgments he makes about matters of fact, history, for example, suggest that he really is not capable of sequential thought which is rather alarming in a president. you add that to the fact that his demonstrated lack of knowledge of american history, his recent talk about andrew jackson angry about a civil war that occurred 16 years after he
it s one of those columns that many of us have put into different ways and most of us haven t found the way put it into words. you re saying the president is actually not able to think. the problem isn t just that his sentences don t parse and his pronouns float around in search of antecedents. it s not just that he s given the verbal fender benders. george w. bush had his share of those. the question is whether or not the way he talks and the judgments he make about matter of fact suggest he s not capable of se kwent shl thought. his lack of knowledge of american history, his recent talk about andrew jackson being angry about a civil war that
have thought in different ways but most of us haven t found the way to put into words. you re saying that the president is actually not able to think. well, the problem, lawrence, isn t just that his sentences don t parse and that his pronouns float around in search of antecedents. it s not that he s sin tactically challenged, it s not just that he s given to verbal fender benders. george w. bush had his share of those. the question is whether or not the way he talks and the judgments he makes about matters of fact, history, for example, suggest that he really is not capable of sequential thought, which is rather alarming in a president. you add that to the fact that his demonstrated lack of knowledge of american history, his recent talk about andrew jackson being angry about a civil war that occurred 16 years after he died, suggests that,