Latest Breaking News On - Federal civil rights case - Page 3 : comparemela.com
he s not a special counsel. he is a clash clasht. hunter biden the case belongs in the justice process. can you lay that play out and i think it needs to be as transparent as possible. we have to make sure that the evidence we put forward before any kind of vote like it like that is overwhelming that it s undeniable and that the american people see what we have seen greg steubey and others republican congressman. s that back and forth continues and more testimony being released the fbi testimony from the house oversight committee the transport being released notified by special assistant agent in charge we would not be allowed to approach the house. this is about being tipped off about a possible hunter biden interview. the question was have you ever been told you could wait outside the target s home until they
hyde. katie, keep on getting a little bit more. a little bit more. and this obviously backs up what the whistleblower was saying to congress. it s corroboration of this idea and this allegation that has been made and proven now with multiple testimony from an fbi whistleblower as a 20-year career. irs whistleblower who put everything on the table to come forward to congress and to talk with you about this case being handled inappropriately. and with political influence in a place where david weiss, the u.s. attorney was in charge of this. this is now the person who is the special counsel, who blew past the statutes of limitations which when you talk to federal prosecutors, they say that s the cardinal sin of when you are a doj prosecutor to do that. and actually would result in your firing in a lot of cases and, yet, now we have david weiss in charge of this moving forward. it also cuts against this argument that the biden administration has made from the white house repeatedly that
where the document if you loom at it case number donald john trump on it and a list of charges. so, moving forward, if this indictment comes out, it will be interesting to compare the actual indictment with what they were posting. but the trump team has, you know, misgivings about the fact that it was posted before the grand jury. bret: voted. voted and finished deliberations. this seems like a huge problem. this comes after the jury foreperson earlier this year was on media doing a number of interviews talking about this process which the trump team had said may hurt the d.a. s case against him. you know, the politics of this is interesting. we have seen every indictment, stef has emboldened the president in g.o.p. primary numbers and even in fundraising. wall street journal obviously with e. obviously has a point of view but saying this could be the one that fatigue starts setting. in you wonder if that s the case. i have actually done some digging through some of the socia
biden. of course, democrats are going through that transcript and highlighting their own sections where they feel like, you know that, that special veto agent was actually, you know, giving important context that there are other ways that they do take into consideration factors like an election and hot person that they are actually getting a search warrant for. so i mean we are going to continue to see these warring versions of the stories and republicans huge win for them. bret: when you lose the washington post editorial board, they write hunter biden should not get special treatment. the imperative of this case remains what it has always been, to treat hunter biden as far as possible like any other defendant. mr. weiss has all the independence and resources he needs. goes on to say that there may be indications here of special treatment. which i think for republicans is kind of loud and clear. a lot of my friends on the left are saying this is actually an overreported story. t
symbolic, i want to point out. in addition, it adds significant time to his sentence. just two months ago, as you know, chauvin had pleaded not guilty in the federal civil rights case. why do you think he changed his plea today? so, i think the first thing is that the evidence was overwhelming. we certainly saw that in the televised trial that i think so much of america followed with respect to his actions, with regard to, you know, just the brutal force that he used. and so, when you are talking about a federal prosecution where you have to show the deprivation of liberty interest, i think there is really no way out of that. so, from a practical perspective, i think he would not have prevailed. another perspective is when you are facing a life sentence, i think that causes you to rethink fighting, as well. and let s just be clear on a couple of things. as it relates to his state sentence, he got 22 1/2 yearings. he will do about 15 years of that time or two-thirds. because of this