of the never trump. i have a feeling you will enjoy it. here s my big take away. president trump needs populist allies. what we are seeing now are the consequences of the original fateful decision. soon after the election the policymaking and policy planning was handed to the establishment republicans in congress. remember what they told us be met we are working on the same plan. we put together a 200 day plan for the president inside the 200 day window is the regulatory repeal and replace obamacare, it s the budget and the rebuilding of the military and tax reform. and infrastructure. those are the things we are working on. oh, and infrastructure, all in 200 days, what a joke. they never had a clue. they didn t understand the revolt that put trump in the white house.
played a part and he went so far as to specifically select roles that reflected episodes in his own life. that s most evident in the murder of pina. he repeatedly performs the role of arrest is the greatest epitome of matricide in antiquity and by doing so repeatedly reminded the public of his own mother s murder. as your. heroes first biographers describe using the scene like attacks and growing state of anxiety. it was at this time that nero made a fateful decision. he really didn t want to rule over the roman world as the princeps the emperor he wanted to recycle witchery he wanted to
for why he had to come out and address leaders in congress to tell them, no, actually we ve come across new things. i just want to be clear about this document. it purports it s a russian intelligence report in which the russians say they have seen an e-mail that they ve acquired. that s how it s described to us, yes. right. that says that debbie wasserman shilts is saying and writing to someone, oh, don t worry about the probe. we ve been assured by lynch s people that they re not going to dig too deeply? sort of. basically she is telling somebody from open society foundation, so she s the sender. ben ar doe is the recipient, and the content is alerting him that loretta lynch is talking to somebody on the clinton campaign to make sure the propose doesn t go in that direction. you ve got dnc talking about attorney general, talking to clinton campaign staffer, and it s in an e-mail that s going from dnc chair to open society foundation s employee. a lot of characters. the ke
investigation. this document was key in comey making that fateful decision. the question is was it because we learned about that from the new york times report in late april. but what our reporting found was that in august they were aware by august at least, they were aware that the intelligence value of it was unreliable. so in easterrly july, did they believe it was reliable and that was influenced their decision as it was prernlted in the new york times article, or was this just explains as a decision making factor to us later on because, again, the public only became aware of it in april. was it used to explain after already knowing it was unreliable as justification for a decision that had been made. the question is, is it the fbi kind of got duped by something that was unreliable and they didn t quite know that yet, by is bad in one way, or did they decide to use something they knew was unreliable to explain a decision that was made earlier. as cover. that s a questio
gotten from diplomats, and military leaders, and people of all stripes, is that the united states, and the west, don t want to see be seen as having taken sides. have we done a good job so far? and what can we do in the future to keep ourselves from appearing to have taken sides? you know, shep, there have been two huge misjudgments from the middle east. one was that saddam hussein had weapons of mass destruction. the other was back in 2011, when it was determined that assad, the president of syria, probably would be gone in a matter of weeks, and therefore we made the kind of fateful decision not to deal with him, or his regime. in fact, i mean, as we ve now it s four years later, 4 1/2 years later, and we re going to have to figure out a way that if not assad personally, then how is syria going to be managed? that is if you just say this is the matter of elections, the sunnis will win because they re more sunnis. the real issue is lesson two of