October 8th board of supervisor agenda. Thank you, item number one . Resolution of amended for the java house restaurant and increasing the Monthly Base Rent to 4,000 and no change to the initial term through august 31st, 2023. I believe we have mark to present today. Madam chair, chair members and board members, im the assistant Deputy Director of real estate and development for the port of San Francisco. The item before you today regards java house restaurant, a small restaurant at pier 40 1 2 located next to south beach harbor. The java house restaurant is a long standing port restaurant which has been operated by the family for over 33 years. In 2006, by their daughter. The java house currently operates under a 15 year lease with the port that expires august 31st, 2023. The original lease covers approximately 14,090 square feet. The original lease provides for the port to receive the greater of guaranteed monthly based rent or percentage rent. The current base rent is 3,314. The pe
Many because we do think the 55 is where we need to be with the arf. We already have challenges with regard to managing 32 as regard to the citations. This is not about any one person or a judgment, it is just the fact the state has given us a number of citations. The plan was rather than leaving the excess capacity we would turn that into hummingbird. I understand there is disagreement about that. That was the plan. We are holding the idea of hummingbirds and fix to go to 55 for the arf. Again, to be really clear from what was that, that is what we put on hold at this point. As we are able to work that out and where those other beds go, i think that your note to us was quite explicit, to the public that we received and i am hoping people would understand that the department is trying to come up with what should be the areas that we are able to have to serve the public that will meet nose needs. It sounds that the department is not saying we dont need an arf capacity. The question is h
Companies to discipline those that are riding on the sidewalk by not allowing them to use it again . We have asked the companies that same question. What weve been told is the accuracy of g. P. S. Equipment right now is plus or minus 6 to 10 feet and thats not accurate in most cases to pin down what is or is not sidewalk riding to do user enforcement or penalties. Theyve all promised to continue to develop that technology. I dont know when it would be available. So in the meantime were doing the best we can with the tools we have. If there are more Technology Tools out there for automatically detecting sidewalk riding we would love to see. Maybe what we need to do locally is to create legislation to say if they they need to create this technology, otherwise we wont give them a permit. Commissioner stephanie. Just on rider accountability, not the company, but rider accountability for the person whos violating and riding the scooter on the sidewalk or has two people on the scooter or is
So i do not support this motion. I think we have to act with urgency. I think it is high time we have an oversight body for a department that has ever expanding budget. Ironically, it was the mayor who didnt support prop c because she said there wasnt enough oversight over the department. So how all of us are not supporting this department right now is absolutely beyond me. So i would encourage all of my colleagues to not support the motion to delay this to march and to act with the urgency that our constituents demand and deserve. President yee supervisor mandelman . Supervisor mandelman thank you, president yee. I want to echo thanks to supervisor haney for the leadership youve provided on a number of issues, and particularly on the sea wall Navigation Center. I think that was a courageous act and the leadership that you provided there is something i think everyone in city hall should be grateful for. I would be grateful for more time on this, this commission. And although again with
I know that i mentioned this to you before and im very happy that youre looking at some of the solutions. And in a way, youre addressing it. There is other issues that i would have enjoyed bringing to the attention to make amendments to it, but i realize and this is my fault i cant really make amendments at this point, because of the our dates. So, im kind of glad the mayor and the stakeholders have reached some key agreements of both to both continue to discuss the need of the critical changes for more responsive department as well as some immediate policy changes to improve the quality of peoples lives right now. Not after november and beyond. Such as a change in the definition of homeless mothers. In support of that discussion, i really well, id like to make a motion to amend the date to march 3, 2020. This will provide us with the breathing room to get everyone to the table and develop a way forward. It accomplishes the objective that we all shared to make our citys work to end hom