British forces, french farces, 8 nations were working along with the united states to counter isis there. and allies weren t told officially that u.s. troops were pulling out. it is it s a framing in the positive rear-view mirror and trying to frame it positively for president trump going forward. nic robertson, nice to see you this morning. thank you for parsing 52 minutes of diplomatty on the globe stage. a lot of unpacking to do. . s say they are hours away from releasing their impeachment report. rint. can we have both? at bp, we re working every day to make energy that s cleaner and better. and we see possibilities everywhere.
Upping the ante with the nuclear option and making it a simple majority for scotus, i think that was huge in terms of decay within the process. and then you had the bork factor which is where now it is recognized by both sides that you get your side a pass. that there are now these farces about impartiality and independence that they can t talk about anything, they can t tell you where they are until they get on the bench and then they have these freakishly consistent penchants such that if you are a move away from your certain direction, one every nine decisions you re called a swing, how do they fix it? well, i think you have to start with the whole process in the selection. in this instance, we, of course, watch the white house farm it out to the federalist society. mr. trump not being a lawyer was not particularly interested in the substance and this is true of other presidents who aren t lawyers. the presidents who are lawyers get much deeper into the weeds of their selections i
With the process. and you have the bourk factor. you get your side a pass. that there are these farces about impartiality and independence they can t talk about anything. they can t tell you where they are until they get on the bench. and they have the freakishly consistent. if you are a move away from your certain direction, one every nine decisions you are a swing. how do they fix it? you have to start with the whole process. in the selection. in this instance we of course watched the white house farm it out to the federal society. mr. trump not being a lawyer was not particularly interested in the substance. and this is true of other presidents who aren t lawyers. the presidents who are lawyers get deeper into the weeds of the selection. and this instance. what has to happen i understand why harry reed blew up the old rule. none of the obama appointees
A second day of hearings were due tomorrow the trial as you said did move very quickly even over eighteen defendant all the evidence was very quickly covered we had the closing arguments of the judges and the prosecutors and then the judge started giving us some ation and then announce that there will be no german this will direct a lot of people s homes fifty cli as michelle are told always one of the six that wasn t granted a pretrial release she s back in prison eight others were released this will certainly fuel suspicions and concerns at this trial with more political and being used as leverage against berlin rather than about any judicial process particularly as it appears to be very little evidence to support this terrorism propaganda charge or some foreign journalists have already been released and without trial since the coup attempts so how are farces deciding who gets released and who stays in jail well indeed you re right there s been a lot of questions over the opera treat
The beginning. fbi agents don t like to be part of farces. sean: jay sekulow, let me ask from your standpoint. i think this is so important especially in light of the special counsel, which was james comey s goal after he leaked his memos to the new york times which may in and of itself have been illegal. and other issues he is involved. 33,000 the lead and subpoenaed acid washed. bleached. destruction of information on blackberries and iphones. why do i think i would be calling you if i did any one of these things because i would be in jail for distracting obstrue and violating the law? james comey had a predetermined outcome about how this was going. he said the information that the two senators said very clearly, the information they were already writing up. exoneration.